HI PAUL
I WONDERING IF SOMEONE TRY THE SAME SYSTEM AS FUEL INJECTION WITH
SERVO,SPYDER AND MECHANICAL INJECTORS,IT SEEMS SO SIMPLE TO COMPARE
WITH THE ELECTRONIC FUEL SYSTEM.
I ASK QUESTIONS BEFORE CONVERT THE 2005 GENESIS
THANK,S PAUL
Jean Prudhomme
Yes it is. Steve Beckham on here did a lot of work with mechanical fuel
injection.
The Mazda rotary engine road racers used it for years.
Paul Lamar
Jean--Don Rivera at Airflow Performance is the guy you need to contact.
He
supplies a complete fuel injection system for rotary aircraft engines.
We
dyno and flight tested his stuff for over 10 years on various rotary
aircraft engines and it worked perfectly. Don worked at Bendix and his
mechanical fuel injection system for aircraft engines is very similar.
Don's
system works as well as, if not better than the original system. Don
also
services certified aircraft Bendix-based systems which are still
supplied
on
new Lycomings, and offers all kinds of services to experimental aircraft
builders including components and full systems. His units are also sold
by
Van's Aircraft.The system we developed for rotary aircraft engines in
the
late 80's and early 90's used Don's components. He has done rotary
projects
with Jim M @ Racing Beat as well. Sean Tucker and all the top airshow
and
aerobatic competitors use Don's injection systems. Great guy, great
family
owned and operated company with great service and products.
Steve Beckham
Steve or anyone know how much this system costs - a bunch is my guess.
George (down under)
$2,860.95 is the list price from Airflow Performance for the 13B kit.
Vlad
Vlad,
I can see why your looking at carbies.
George (down under)
That's pretty steep pricing, indeed. Is it cheaper than the Lycoming
setup? The rotary only needs half the nozzles and spider outlets.
Then again, I guess it's probably a fuel pump setup that's not common
to anyone else - the LyCont FI setups being accessory case driven..
The Holley with the leaning block looks better and better. I'm not
_that_ interested in sustained inverted flight. For naturally
aspirated, I think the Holley will be tough to beat. Parts available
world-wide, any mechanic can figure out how it works, cheap rebuilds,
known tuneability.
I think the only way FI makes sense on the rotary is for forced
induction or for aerobatics (which opens a whole other set of
challenges (oil management)). FI makes more sense on a regular
multi-cylinder piston engine because it offers relatively easy
balancing of fuel flows between the cylinders. On a two rotor engine,
it should be relatively easy to get good fuel (and air) distribution
given that there are only two induction paths.
Regards,
Matt-
I couldn't have said it better Matt. I'd venture to say that the Airflow
Performance kit is most likely still cheaper than the OEM system. In
regards
to the Holley, sure seems nice to pay $80 for a oem 'renew' kit and drop
the
whole lot off at a local mechanic for a rebuild. Talk about chump change
in
aviation money.
Vlad
Good.
The only thing I might back off from is Paul's 555 system. It
definitely shows a lot of promise, but it's as yet unproven. I am
hopeful, but I'm still enamored with the idea of buying nearly off the
shelf stuff. It also sounds like Mark's engine may be around the
corner with Tracy's injection system. I'll be interested in
continuing updates on Mark's status.
Regards,
Matt-
Matt are you sending stuff out in html format?
Paul Lamar
Paul's 555 system shows an amazing amount of potential. If I were ever in
need of a standalone, I would either build a 555 or buy a MegaSquirt and
call it a day. The simplicity and cost make the 555 really shine but the
problem I have with the system is the need for a MAF sensor. I understand
why Tracy choose to use MAP instead as the costs for a new MAF sensor are
just ridiculous. This all goes back to how many people REALLY need efi?
Vlad
I'll be back working on that soon. I have a p-port RX8 motor I will run it
one.
Paul Lamar
Paul,
I'm not an electrical engineer by any stretch of the imagination so I have
to ask why can't the 555 system be converted to run info from a MAP sensor?
I know I said I'd refrain from asking questions as to 'not waste your time'
but I'll play a hypocrite for the sake of knowledge.
Vlad
You could but why would you want to do that? You have seen all the
trouble people have had trying to tune MAP systems. It is not for nothing
the entire automotive world uses mass air flow sensors. The mass air flow sensor
does it all for you.
Paul Lamar
--
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Youtube key word UTUBPLEASE
Copyright 1998-2008 All world wide rights reserved.