Fellow Bearhawk Builder is looking at various engine options:
When I suggest a Rotary is the response:
They consume too much fuel, as there was a Kit Plane article
that said they had much worse consumption than a 180hp 0-360.
Looking for solid fuel consumption evidence to post up. RX8 vs RX7 also a
plus.
Thanks,
Tom Walter
Not true. Ask anybody flying them. They are about 5% worse and they will
burn auto fuel which is a 25% savings.
Paul Lamar
Paul,
I believe Tom lives in the Austin area. In Austin 100LL is about
$3.75/gallon at present time and 87UL is approx. $2.55/gallon, or $1.20
less. That is a 47% savings. Kinda makes the 5% higher fuel burn look
insignificant in my book. My Lancair holds 94 gallons; which works out to
$112 savings per tank.
And take into account that we can use $5 spark plugs and $3.00 oil filters,
and the savings really begin to add up.
There I go again... preaching to the choir. ;-)
Mark S.
--
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Youtube key word UTUBPLEASE
Copyright 1998-2009 All world wide rights reserved.