Will the engine run "OK" with only one plug per rotor firing? How
convenient of Mazda to include two spark plugs.
Matt Naiva
It will but the power out depends on which
plug. The top plug you may hardly notice
the lower plug you will have a significant power loss.
You need to change the old type plugs every 50 hours.
Rotaries fire twice as often per rev than
a piston engine. At a given prop RPM four times
as often as a 2500 RPM direct drive aircraft
engine. Now this is for the old style metal plugs.
The plugs in my RX8 are Iridium and we have no
data on the life of these plugs in aircraft service.
A car cruises at 3000 RPM on the freeway so it might
be half as long as the rotary. I have 30,000 miles
on the plugs I have in there now. At an avg. speed of
60 MPH that is 500 hours. However it is unlikely they
will last 25 hours in aircraft service.
I also notice they are charging a lot of money for these
plugs.
Paul Lamar
Hi Paul,
I take it you mean the lower(leading) plug firing, you will not notice a
difference. The upper plug (trailing) firing will contribute to a
noticeable
power loss.
Dale Davies
I said it right.
The leading plug (lower) you WILL notice a difference.
The top plug (trailing) you may not notice a difference.
You can see it in this picture. The top hole (trailing) is very small
with the plug mostly shrouded. This is why it is not all that effective in
firing the mixture on its own. It is mainly there to fire the residual
un burned hydro carbons that have not burned because of the squish
effect.
The hole must be small as some of the compression pressure will be lost
to a leak as the apex seal passes over it.
Note my invention back in 1975 :)
Paul Lamar
Has anyone considered using a slot in parallel to the apex, instead of a
small hole for the top plug?
Ed Carver
Not that I am aware of.
Paul Lamar
--
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Youtube key word PaulLamar2
Copyright 1998-2010 All world wide rights reserved.