Hi Paul and all, I ran across this today. It seems the Boys at MIT are
 working on a new rotary engine design. Kind of interesting and here is
 the link to the videoâ?¦ http://www.technologyreview.com/video/?vid=683

 Enjoy,
  Rick in Alaska
   MIT is going down hill by allowing their name to be attached to this
 project.
  This engine meets almost none of the requirements for a successful
 rotary engine.

 Paul Lamar
  ------------------------------------------------------------
 By Kenichi Yamamoto from his book "Rotary Engine" 1981
  1.3   REQUIREMENTS FOR A PRACTICAL ROTARY ENGINE
      Although various types of rotary engines have been
 developed to date, there are few that do not qualify as internal
 combustion engines or do not qualify as a practical engine even
 if they satisfy the qualifications of an internal combustion
 engine.
      The requirements for a rotary engine to be qualified
 as a practical internal combustion engine can be summed up in
 the following five items. The practicality of various ideas on
 rotary engines can be judged by evaluating them by these
 criteria:
  (1) Every moving part, including the timing mechanism, should
 make a rotating motion. A mechanism having a reciprocating
 inertia will increase mechanical noise and vibration, and will
 work against high speed and high revolution. [In addition
 mechanisms that reciprocate generate reversing loads. Reversing
 loads lead to reversing stresses. Reversing stresses lead to
 metal fatigue and limited life. The Wankel rotary engine has no
 reversing stresses therefor the life of the major parts such as the
 eccentric shaft and rotor are unlimited unlike, crankshafts, connecting
 rods, pistons and poppet valves. Paul Lamar] Accordingly, structures
 that require intake and exhaust valves and mechanisms using the rotors
 oscillatory motion are not desirable.
  (2)   Gas seals or the working chamber should be three
 dimensionally reliable. The gas seal mechanism of a rotary
 engine should be constituted by connecting the individual seals
 three dimensionally. Among the many ideas we come across are
 those that don't show such three dimensional thoughts.
  (3)   Appropriate gas exchange of intake and exhaust should
 take place. Together with having a mechanism that can correctly
 open and close the ports, sufficient time for intake and exhaust
 should be provided especially for high speed and high
 revolution. Among the ideas on rotary engines, there are some
 that ignore this point.
  (4)   Every component part should have the strength to endure
 high speed and high pressure. As the component parts are
 exposed to high pressure, high sliding velocity and high heat
 load, every part should have sufficient allowance in size and in
 shape.
  (5)   Sufficient cooling and lubrication should be provided.
 In order to qualify as an internal combustion engine, although
 this is related to above (4), durability against high heat load,
 high sliding velocity, etc. are required. Therefore, the
 structure should be simple, and the ideas on rotor cooling,
 lubrication of seal parts, and oil seal structure should be
 those that are given adequate thought.
      Also, it is desirable for a practical rotary engine to
 have a simple and compact structure. When we evaluate the
 various type's of rotary engines devised to date in view of the
 above mentioned requirements, the NSU Wankel type rotary engine
 is the engine that best satisfies the above mentioned
 requirements.
  It's some kids friggin' toy model. He couldn't even get the model to
 work
 correctly! Sorry, but they raised $5Million in venture capitol, which is
 amazing in this market. Often the company has some IP that is neat, so
 venture capitol will jump in as they realize they can sell the IP later to
 make some money off it
  From their web site:
  The LiquidPiston engine is based on a patent-pending thermodynamic cycle,
 called the "High-Efficiency Hybrid Cycle" (HEHC), which borrows elements
 from Otto, Diesel, Atkinson, and Rankine cycles. Several critical design
 features make the LiquidPiston engine architecture both versatile and
 capable of outperforming conventional engines on all parameters.

  LPIâ??s engine is architected to have the following unique properties:
   * High fuel efficiency of 57% at peak, and 50% at part-load
   * High power density of 1 Hp / Lb
   * Simple design with low part count
   * Multi-fuel capable: diesel, JP8, gasoline, natural gas, bio-fuels
   * Low noise: the engine has low pressure exhaust and no poppet valves

  MIT has zero to do with that, the Tech Review is a "what is interesting
 in the market place".
  For $5Million we could develop a high pressure (1500 bar) injector to
 make a
 Mazda just hmmmm..... Irony is that injector would be worth more than a
 frigging working rotary aircraft engine. There are just millons on
 inventions just waiting, and I realized how to change fuel at the atomic
 level (piezoelectric gates are huge, we need something smaller!)
 Wow... just realized 2011 Marks the Bosch 125 year anniversary.  I worked
 for Bosch (Reutlingen, Germany) when we celebrated 100 years of automotive
 engineering.
 Fun conversation the other night, with a group of friends. What would you
 do
 if you won that $200 Million Jackpot. Everyone pretty much said "go live
 on
 the beach" or something to that effect. My wife knows me too well, and
 commented "I'd never get him to settle down and sit still for a minute".
 There is so much research and development out there is is just mind
 boggling....

 Tom W


 Tom,
 I'm rather leery of living near the beach at the moment. If the wave
 doesn't get you, the radiation will:)
 I also laughed when their model didn't work. There is an axiom in the
 design business. "Never show a work in progress."
 Their model looks remarkably like the air motors developed in Italy and
 Australia. For creating a robust combustion chamber they will have to
 toss the sliding vanes and replace them with some type of roller cams.
 Sealing revolving chambers as Mazda well knows is an daunting challenge.
 75% efficient? Dream on.

 Doug in Japan
 Hey Doug. I know you can send out plain text.
 Robin has a mac and she does it all the time.
 Every time you forward a message your computer removes
 carriage returns and adds line spaces.
 Could you research this for me?
 Perhaps just buy a PC or a Linux box:)

 Does anybody know if Thunderbird runs on a MAC?
 Paul

Consider the following.....
Dr. Ed Crow the former VP of Engineering of Pratt and Whitney is an adviser
/ board member. I knew him in a professional capacity, and if he is throwing
his shoulder against the wheel that is enough to peak my interest, he is no
light weight, a brilliant man, he is a Doctorate in Engineering. When I was
their, he was a big champion of the "geared turbofan" that Pratt is in the
process of getting their Type Certificate for that is a game changer....
Anthony

How old is he?
Paul Lamar



Anthony,

Please find out the inside scoop on this one.

Board of Director & Advisors are paid positions. It is very
common to have an impressive BoD, as you are trying to gain
funding from Venture Capitol. So often folks join in to help
direct and steer the company, but are paid in either cash
or stock.

I know of one BoD, when asked why he joined the board of that
company, well it was $100K/yr for meeting twice a year! The
company didn't have a viable product, but had created some
great IP that was very interesting. After being acquired,
product line was shut down, but the IP was worth much more
than the company.

There are some products that make sense, but other things
like the invention of vulcanized rubber that no one saw coming.
Yes, made the tire practical, but it that process that was
so revolutionary at the time. Same thing happens today with
everyone wondering "why the heck did you want to buy a tire
company, but you already make tires.... ".

Tom  Walter

MIT also is associated with the Terrafugia. IMHO the dumbest flying
car ever. It is slowly transitioning into a viable airplane with
the help of a political  waivers from the FAA and  DOT on crash
and LSA rules. So if you are building a flying car you don't
have to meet the car safety rules and the LSA rules.

Baloney from the web site:

"The recent grant of 110 pounds (50 kg) by the FAA for the Transition® within the Light Sport Aircraft category also allows the next generation design to incorporate modern automotive-style safety features currently unavailable in other light aircraft."

The answer is a flying motor cycle. No crash and bumper rules.
http://www.rotaryeng.net/roadable.html

Paul Lamar