Dave was explaining this to some of the pilots
at Reno.
Most tractor airplanes have down force on the tail
to counter the lift on the wing. That is because
the CG is always ahead of the center of lift on the
wing. That makes for a longitudinally stable airplane.
Cambered airfoils have a negative pitching moment (Cm) tending
to pitch nose-down with an increase in speed.
With no elevator input and an increase in power and speed
the airplane will pitch down.
Conversely as you slow the airplane you must pull aft
on the stick raising the elevator and pitching up to prevent a
decrease in altitude and maintain straight and
level flight.
The down force on the tail needs to be increased with
up elevator to counter this. It can be done by pulling back
on the stick. It can also be done by moving
the trim tab down forcing the elevator up. The trim tab
is an aerodynamic servo. This neutralizes the stick force
for straight and level flight.
If the trim tab departs the elevator the elevator will
tend to stream line it self placing a forward force
on the stick.
If the pilot holds the stick fixed the aircraft
will stay where it is. If he releases the stick
the aircraft will pitch down.
Scenario number 2.
If the trim tab is up forcing the elevator down
due to perhaps an aft CG problem. Supposedly there
was a large tank in the fuselage that held ADI fluid.
In this tank was a water to water heat exchanger.
The idea here was the ADI fluid would boil off
cooling the water to water heat exchanger for a total
loss cooling system. No conventional cooling
system with its inevitable drag.
Then the aircraft would pitch up and the stick force
would be aft.
Perhaps I am wrong about all this.
Paul Lamar
Yea, I think you have it wrong Paul.
The h-stab is set at a negative AOA to create a downforce (plane pitch up -
that way when the h-stab stalls, the nose pitches down and you can recover
from the stall). But that aerodynamic down-force is dependent on airspeed,
while the force needed to balance the weigh of the engine is fixed. So to
compensate for various speeds (and CG loading) the trim is used. As the
plane goes faster, the aerodynamic down force of the empenage increases
(aircraft pitch up), so pitch-down trim must be added for level flight.
The P-51 going 470 mph will have a very large pitch-down setting on the trim
because that is well above the aircraft's max speed.
Suddenly remove that pitch down trim tab and the plane will suddenly pitch
up (the tab is up, pushing the elevator down, pushing the tail up, pitching
the plane down)
It sure seems like that is what happened to the Ghost. The sudden pitch up
from loss of the tab caused GLOC. The aircraft landed in a random location,
which was a bad spot, but it could have been worse.
--
David Leonard
So now we have to explain why the left elevator trim tab parted company with
its elevator. I won't be a bit surprised if the NTSB discovers symptoms of
a high speed flutter event precipitating trim tab failure, which in turn
would throw the elevator out of balance and make it more susceptible to
flutter.
I agree with Dave--the pilot blacked out and was just a passenger for the
ensuing wild ride. I don't see any evidence of any control system
deflection in any of the posted photos. (Of course, at those speeds it
wouldn't take much deflection to make a difference.)
Speaking of photos, how did they get such sharp images of a maneuvering
airplane so obviously out of control?
Tom Parkes
There have been some remarkable improvements in digital cameras
lately. I have a Panasonic with a Leica lens that continues
to astound me. I was a Nikon fan years ago.
http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/LUMIX-Digital-Cameras-Point-amp-Shoot-Models/model.DMC-FZ100K.S_11002_7000000000000005702#tabsection
http://tinyurl.com/3jdqfzt
Paul Lamar
--
The Rotary Engine NewsLetter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
Youtube key word PaulLamar2
Copyright 1998-2011 All world wide rights reserved.