Subject: intake runner length
From: rotaryeng
Date: 4/30/2012, 6:15 PM
To: AAAA Put this in the To box


   I have decided to use a turbo p-port 13b on my Wheeler. I have the
   core  engine completed and sitting on the engine mount at the
   moment. Before I  make the engine mounts, etc. and start laying out
   the rest of the engine  compartment I need to confirm a couple of
   things-

     My plan is to have around 250HP or so (maybe a little more) and
   end up with  a modest boost at take-off power. The boost will be
   controlled to maintain  this power level if desired up at altitude.

     1. The first question is about the intake runners. Is it necessary
   to  maintain the 18 inch length of the runners even if I run a
   turbo? Or, can I  run the turbo discharge into a plenum with just
   enough tubing to make it in  to the plenum after the throttle plates?

     2. Is sufficient heat available from the cooling water (read
   heater core)  to provide cabin heat at high altitudes in cold
   weather. Here in FL heat  wasn't much of an issue other than having
   too much of it, but in the  Carolinas in the winter I have seen OAT
   below 0 at 12,500'. That's cold.  I  remember that the rotary uses
   the oil as a means to remove waste heat, so  would it be a better
   idea to use oil as a means to heat the heater core for  cabin heat?

     3. There has been a lot of discussion about turbos and getting
   them to live  longer than an hour or 2 with the rotary. I have found
   2 types of turbos  that are described as "continuous running"- one
   has ceramic bearings and  the other has a "floating journal".
   Advice here would be helpful- the  turbo I select will determine the
   exhaust header selection.  A model number  or something would be a
   great start.

     Kevin Alderman

     On the intake length the 18 inches are still an advantage with a
   turbo as  during  the low boost phase there is still a breathing
   advantage. That translates  to slightly  lower fuel burn per HP generated.

     If you send me a sketch of the fire wall I'll do a 3D layout of
   the motor  mount  and turbo installation.

     The KIS  shown has a higher thrust line than most aircraft so the position
     of
     the thrust line relative to the top of the firewall is important
   for 18  inch runner  clearance.

     Paul Lamar

    I am using the Viking mount that I have- the Viking is 4 inches narrower
    than the Wheeler but that was a minor modification.  The problem at
   the moment is the thrust line and the cowl that came with the plane.
   When the engine is centered up I only have 1 inch or so between it
   and the cowl on top. I measured my Connie and the only way it would
   have worked is because the high point is at the extreme rear at the
   mags. The mags would have been about 1/2 inch from the cowl. I can
   get more clearance by lowering the thrust line, not my first choice.

    The later Wheelers have a conventional tail not the cruciform tail
   that I have- and the thrust line is about 2 inches lower. I assume
   that the tail had something to do with placement of the thrust line.
   The only recurring complaint about the CT Wheeler is that it has low
   tail authority on landing. Moving the propwash and thrust line down
   might make this worse.

    The good news is that my cowling is 46 inches long- which gives me
   about a half acre under the cowl for the engine. The 13B looks quite
   small naked under there at the moment. I have the plane blocked up
   at the spar, and with the engine sitting in place I still need 100
   lbs just to get a neutral CG. With that info, I need to get as much
   of the engine done as possible
    (hanging parts on it) so that I can get my WB right. Which means
   turbo, etc. is up on the list.

    I have reservations about using the cooling air ducted into the cockpit.
    The cowl flaps that you showed are under the plane at the exhaust-
    and any exhaust leakage particularly under the cowl would be
   directed into the cockpit. My ventilation is through NACA vents on
   either side of the plane well away from any exhaust. The air from
   these vents will be ducted through air vents to the passengers, or
   can be diverted through an RX8 heater core mounted behind the panel.

    Kevin Alderman

    Yes I can see that you have less clearance under the the cowl than
   a KIS cruiser. That rules out the 18 inch up and over intake
   runners. I assume you are using the Viking nose gear as well. Moving
   the thrust line down without moving the entire motor down would
   affect the prop clearance as well of course.

    Your scheme of using a beam to pick up the front connie mounts will
   work well with a custom oil pan. That will put the engine/GB/prop CG
   right over the front connie mounts. The rear connie mounts can be ignored.

    We used to use that and called it a Schertz beam. It was patterned after
    the QuestAir
    Venture mount. Here is some shots of the QA set up.

    I assumed you were going to use a simple 180 degree side exhaust
   out of the turbo but a RX8 heater core will also work well.

    I can still do a 3D of your set up if you give me a few dims such
   as the distance of the thrust line down from the top of the firewall
   and the dims between motor mount points.

    Paul Lamar

   I will be out of town (read away from the airplane project) for a
   week, I can document the dims  on the mount when I get back. I have
   decided not to use the Viking nose gear- after a LOT of work I just
   cant get the retractable gear to work in the wings, the Wheeler wing
   is too thin. So, I will use the Wheeler factory fixed gear setup
   with the castering nose gear. The Wheeler has no provisions for
   steerable nose gear, as it was designed to be steered with
   differential braking. So, to avoid lots of extra work I went back to
   the original. I was willing to adapt the plane for retractable gear,
   but not just for the nose.

   Do you have a  known thickness for a header for the turbo that will work
   for this application? I have found several made from SS, but I want
   to make sure that they will not burn through in the air.

   Back to the intake runners, I do have plenty of room to route the intake
   runners up and rearward (toward the firewall) and keep them in the
   range of 18".

   Kevin Alderman

   The stock 2nd gen will work but most used ones are already cracked.
   The sharp machined edges need to be radius-ed with a die grander.

   V out the cracks and weld them up. It will last 5 years.

   Paul Lamar



   What is the welding procedure you recommend? There is high Nickel arc rod or
 preheat and Oxy Acetylene weld with cast rod that I know of. I know some
 cylinder blocks welded in non structural areas with the nickel rod. In the
 exhaust, I would expect cracking beside the weld.

 Dale Davies

 I am no expert on the subject. Larry Childs welded a front end housing for
 me and he says the secret is... heat it in an oven before welding and make sure it
 cools very slowly.

 Paul Lamar



Every time I've tried to weld on cast Fe all I got was a maze of cracks
no matter what combination of weld wire/preheat I used.  YMMV

  Mark LaPierre

Maybe Larry will reveal his secrets.

Paul Lamar

-- The Rotary Engine News Letter. Powered by Linux. ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube key word PaulLamar2 Copyright 1998-2012 All world wide rights reserved.