Subject: 6 rotor engine running
From: rotaryeng
Date: 7/24/2012, 2:32 PM
To: AAAA Put this in the To box

  http://www.7tune.com/video-ppres-6-rotor-beast-is-alive/

  Rob Woods

     Paul it's not a slide throttle is it?  they look like 6 butterfly's
  to me.  How would you keep the E shaft together, or can one be made in
  one piece. Would windup be a problem
    as "P" ported should produce 100 hp per rotor 500 hp at the last
  rotor plus the extra from that rotor!!
         John Burey

  All good questions :)

  A p-port will yeild 150 HP per rotor at 10,000 RPM if the shafts lives :)
  900 HP!

  Paul Lamar




 http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.388296644556315.103373.208088479243
  800&type=3<
 http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.388296644556315.103373.208088479243800&type=3

  Rob Woods

  http://www.hurleyrotary.com/page.php?currentpageref=6265

  "After ten years of development HME are now proud to offer our multi-rotor
  engine
  conversions, the first triple engine was built three years ago and has
 been
  tested by
  many magazines in the United Kingdom, Europe and Australia, all of which
  have been
  impressed with the performance and fuel economy. To date 25 engines have
  been built
  for road and racing."

  "The turbine smooth and refined performance of the triple rotor cannot be
  compared
  with a ported and tuned twin rotor giving the same max. power output.
  For example the acceleration time from 40-60 MPH in fifth gear is only 6.5
  seconds as
  compared to the standard time of 10.5 seconds = 40% faster, and a 0-60 in
 a
  little
  over 5 seconds while still returning 25 MPG+ motorway driving, and an
 added
  bonus of
  the triple rotor is the truly magnificent exhaust note. The engine has
  excellent low
  speed torque which makes it very easy town driving."

  "The total weight of the Triple Engine is 315 lbs. together with
  carburettor
  and
  exhaust system, is in fact 15 lbs. lighter that the standard RX-7 engine,
  with
  carburettor and exhaust system and is only 4 3/4" (120mm) longer."



  "...for the ultimate in performance
  600 BHP Hurley Quad Rotor Engine P.O.A.
  900 BHP Hurley Six Rotor Engine Seeing is Believing ! "


  Will it cool?

  Will that tiny e-shaft diameter at the back end live under high continuous
  power?

  Will the shaft couplings live?

  What do the oil drain backs look like on the other side of the
 intermediate
  housings?

  Paul Lamar

  Paul,

  Looks nice!.... E-Shaft strength and the harmonics going past four rotors
  seems to be difficult unless all things were design from the beginning for
  that use. I believe in bigger displacement after four rotor
 configurations.
  Very nice looking work on the engine.

  Eric Barger

 Paul,   This thread seems to be mixing two different companies. Pulse is
 in Nz and Hurley is in Uk,

         In the facebook link above  down in the comments there is a
 response from  Pulse concerning the E-shaft. As I read it they have bored
 the shaft out of the e-shaft and splined the bores to correspond to
 splines on the shaft and located these parts with "tappers" which may mean
 set screws. The counterweights are keyed.  As described there are no shaft
 couplings. As for strength , the shaft is a larger diameter than a
 transmission input shaft which on a race car can deal with 24 hour races
 at 900 HP. I haven't found anything on the oil drain back but it is
 workable
 even if the OD of the stationary gear is used as a pilot by drilling
 between the mounting holes for the oil to enter the intermediate housings.
 There likely would be some shaft wind up but each rotor is timed with a
 stationary gear independent of the other rotors.  In my opinion cooling is
 hopeless in a steady state condition. There have been housings converted to
 parallel cooling  but I see no indication of this modification in either of
 these engines. Also a stock Mazda water pump would not circulate enough
 coolant for parallel cooling beyond 3 rotors. The video shows a running
 engine which is unloaded so it is  only making enough power to turn it's
 own parts, probably 30 HP.
          As you might recall I was intending to do a six rotor. The plan is
 viable in all respects.It would be a standard 3 rotor accessory end coupled
 to a second 3 rotor on the drive end which has the removable eccentric
 modified for a full diameter shaft.  The end housings are dowel
 aligned mating bell housings. The housing patterns incorporate all the
 oiling/cooling and structural modifications and the waterpump (chrysler
 hemi) and dry sump pumps are Nascar belt drive. I have altered the plan
 back to 4 rotors due to airframe  refinement in X-plane  simulations. A
 four rotor allows the use of stock RX-8 internals and rotor housings which
 are 1/3 the price of 3 rotor parts. Reducing engine weight and fuel weight
 significantly reduce landing speeds.

 george grimes

 If the shaft is not one piece there are couplings :)

 Yes I know. I did it on purpose. The e-shaft couplings appear to be
 different.

 Here is the way CW did it on a four rotor. Makes more sense in many
 regards (cooling,
 tension bolts to name a few) but would require split intermediate housing.
 If you are
 making billet housing that would be no real problem anyway.

 The shaft may not break but one must deal with the flywheel coupling.

 Paul Lamar

Paul, it would be great if you showed the photos or the innovative
REMOVABLE intermediate bearings Curtis-Wright came up with.
Bill Jepson

Here they are.

Paul Lamar

-- The Rotary Engine News Letter. Powered by Linux. ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube key word PaulLamar2 Copyright 1998-2012 All world wide rights reserved.