Subject: : 6 rotor engine running
From: rotaryeng
Date: 7/24/2012, 5:24 PM
To: AAAA Put this in the To box


   http://www.7tune.com/video-ppres-6-rotor-beast-is-alive/

   Rob Woods

      Paul it's not a slide throttle is it?  they look like 6 butterfly's
   to me.  How would you keep the E shaft together, or can one be made in
   one piece. Would windup be a problem
     as "P" ported should produce 100 hp per rotor 500 hp at the last
   rotor plus the extra from that rotor!!
          John Burey

   All good questions :)

   A p-port will yeild 150 HP per rotor at 10,000 RPM if the shafts lives :)
   900 HP!

   Paul Lamar





 http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.388296644556315.103373.208088479243
   800&type=3<

 http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.388296644556315.103373.208088479243800&type=3

   Rob Woods

   http://www.hurleyrotary.com/page.php?currentpageref=6265

   "After ten years of development HME are now proud to offer our
 multi-rotor
   engine
   conversions, the first triple engine was built three years ago and has
  been
   tested by
   many magazines in the United Kingdom, Europe and Australia, all of which
   have been
   impressed with the performance and fuel economy. To date 25 engines have
   been built
   for road and racing."

   "The turbine smooth and refined performance of the triple rotor cannot be
   compared
   with a ported and tuned twin rotor giving the same max. power output.
   For example the acceleration time from 40-60 MPH in fifth gear is only
 6.5
   seconds as
   compared to the standard time of 10.5 seconds = 40% faster, and a 0-60 in
  a
   little
   over 5 seconds while still returning 25 MPG+ motorway driving, and an
  added
   bonus of
   the triple rotor is the truly magnificent exhaust note. The engine has
   excellent low
   speed torque which makes it very easy town driving."

   "The total weight of the Triple Engine is 315 lbs. together with
   carburettor
   and
   exhaust system, is in fact 15 lbs. lighter that the standard RX-7 engine,
   with
   carburettor and exhaust system and is only 4 3/4" (120mm) longer."



   "...for the ultimate in performance
   600 BHP Hurley Quad Rotor Engine P.O.A.
   900 BHP Hurley Six Rotor Engine Seeing is Believing ! "


   Will it cool?

   Will that tiny e-shaft diameter at the back end live under high
 continuous
   power?

   Will the shaft couplings live?

   What do the oil drain backs look like on the other side of the
  intermediate
   housings?

   Paul Lamar

   Paul,

   Looks nice!.... E-Shaft strength and the harmonics going past four rotors
   seems to be difficult unless all things were design from the beginning
 for
   that use. I believe in bigger displacement after four rotor
  configurations.
   Very nice looking work on the engine.

   Eric Barger

  Paul,   This thread seems to be mixing two different companies. Pulse is
  in Nz and Hurley is in Uk,

          In the facebook link above  down in the comments there is a
  response from  Pulse concerning the E-shaft. As I read it they have bored
  the shaft out of the e-shaft and splined the bores to correspond to
  splines on the shaft and located these parts with "tappers" which may mean
  set screws. The counterweights are keyed.  As described there are no shaft
  couplings. As for strength , the shaft is a larger diameter than a
  transmission input shaft which on a race car can deal with 24 hour races
  at 900 HP. I haven't found anything on the oil drain back but it is
  workable
  even if the OD of the stationary gear is used as a pilot by drilling
  between the mounting holes for the oil to enter the intermediate housings.
  There likely would be some shaft wind up but each rotor is timed with a
  stationary gear independent of the other rotors.  In my opinion cooling is
  hopeless in a steady state condition. There have been housings converted
 to
  parallel cooling  but I see no indication of this modification in either
 of
  these engines. Also a stock Mazda water pump would not circulate enough
  coolant for parallel cooling beyond 3 rotors. The video shows a running
  engine which is unloaded so it is  only making enough power to turn it's
  own parts, probably 30 HP.
           As you might recall I was intending to do a six rotor. The plan
 is
  viable in all respects.It would be a standard 3 rotor accessory end
 coupled
  to a second 3 rotor on the drive end which has the removable eccentric
  modified for a full diameter shaft.  The end housings are dowel
  aligned mating bell housings. The housing patterns incorporate all the
  oiling/cooling and structural modifications and the waterpump (chrysler
  hemi) and dry sump pumps are Nascar belt drive. I have altered the plan
  back to 4 rotors due to airframe  refinement in X-plane  simulations. A
  four rotor allows the use of stock RX-8 internals and rotor housings which
  are 1/3 the price of 3 rotor parts. Reducing engine weight and fuel weight
  significantly reduce landing speeds.

  george grimes

  If the shaft is not one piece there are couplings :)

  Yes I know. I did it on purpose. The e-shaft couplings appear to be
  different.

  Here is the way CW did it on a four rotor. Makes more sense in many
  regards (cooling,
  tension bolts to name a few) but would require split intermediate housing.
  If you are
  making billet housing that would be no real problem anyway.

  The shaft may not break but one must deal with the flywheel coupling.

  Paul Lamar

 Paul, it would be great if you showed the photos or the innovative
 REMOVABLE intermediate bearings Curtis-Wright came up with.
 Bill Jepson

 Here they are.

 Paul Lamar

Thanks Paul,
One thing I really like about the CW bearing idea is that there is no real
need for a larger intermediate housing. In an Multi-rotor engine you could
shorten the engine considerably.
Bill Jepson

-- The Rotary Engine News Letter. Powered by Linux. ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube key word PaulLamar2 Copyright 1998-2012 All world wide rights reserved.