Subject: 6 rotor engine running
From: rotaryeng
Date: 7/25/2012, 6:14 AM
To: AAAA Put this in the To box


 http://www.7tune.com/video-ppres-6-rotor-beast-is-alive/

   Rob Woods

      Paul it's not a slide throttle is it?  they look like 6 butterfly's
   to me.  How would you keep the E shaft together, or can one be made
  in one piece. Would windup be a problem   as "P" ported should
  produce 100 hp per rotor 500 hp at the last rotor plus the extra
  from that rotor!!        John Burey

   All good questions :)

   A p-port will yeild 150 HP per rotor at 10,000 RPM if the shafts
  lives :) 900 HP!

   Paul Lamar

   http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.388296644556315.103373.208088479243

   Rob Woods

   http://www.hurleyrotary.com/page.php?currentpageref=6265

   "After ten years of development HME are now proud to offer our
  multi-rotor engine conversions, the first triple engine was built
  three years ago and has been tested by many magazines in the United
  Kingdom, Europe and Australia, all of which have been impressed with
  the performance and fuel economy. To date 25 engines have been built
  for road and racing."

   "The turbine smooth and refined performance of the triple rotor
  cannot be compared with a ported and tuned twin rotor giving the
  same max. power output. For example the acceleration time from 40-60
  MPH in fifth gear is only 6.5 seconds as compared to the standard
  time of 10.5 seconds = 40% faster, and a 0-60 in a little over 5
  seconds while still returning 25 MPG+ motorway driving, and an added
  bonus of the triple rotor is the truly magnificent exhaust note. The
  engine has excellent low speed torque which makes it very easy town
 driving."

   "The total weight of the Triple Engine is 315 lbs. together with
   carburettor
   and
   exhaust system, is in fact 15 lbs. lighter that the standard RX-7
  engine, with carburettor and exhaust system and is only 4 3/4"
  (120mm) longer."

   "...for the ultimate in performance
   600 BHP Hurley Quad Rotor Engine P.O.A.
   900 BHP Hurley Six Rotor Engine Seeing is Believing ! "

   Will it cool?

   Will that tiny e-shaft diameter at the back end live under high continuous
   power?

   Will the shaft couplings live?

   What do the oil drain backs look like on the other side of the intermediate
   housings?

   Paul Lamar

   Paul,

   Looks nice!.... E-Shaft strength and the harmonics going past four
 rotors  seems to be difficult unless all things were design from the
 beginning for that use. I believe in bigger displacement after four
 rotor configurations. Very nice looking work on the engine.

   Eric Barger

  Paul,   This thread seems to be mixing two different companies.
  Pulse is in Nz and Hurley is in Uk,

          In the facebook link above  down in the comments there is a
  response from  Pulse concerning the E-shaft. As I read it they have
 bored the shaft out of the e-shaft and splined the bores to
 correspond to splines on the shaft and located these parts with
 "tappers" which may mean set screws. The counterweights are keyed.
  As described there are no shaft couplings. As for strength , the
 shaft is a larger diameter than a transmission input shaft which on
 a race car can deal with 24 hour races at 900 HP. I haven't found
 anything on the oil drain back but it is workable even if the OD of the
  stationary gear is used as a pilot by drilling between the mounting
  holes for the oil to enter the intermediate housings. There likely
  would be some shaft wind up but each rotor is timed with a
  stationary gear independent of the other rotors.  In my opinion
  cooling is hopeless in a steady state condition. There have been
  housings converted to parallel cooling  but I see no indication of
  this modification in either of these engines. Also a stock Mazda
  water pump would not circulate enough coolant for parallel cooling
  beyond 3 rotors. The video shows a running engine which is unloaded
  so it is  only making enough power to turn it's own parts, probably
  30 HP.         As you might recall I was intending to do a six
  rotor. The plan is viable in all respects.It would be a standard 3
  rotor accessory end coupled to a second 3 rotor on the drive end
  which has the removable eccentric modified for a full diameter
  shaft.  The end housings are dowel aligned mating bell housings. The
  housing patterns incorporate all the oiling/cooling and structural
  modifications and the waterpump (chrysler hemi) and dry sump pumps
  are Nascar belt drive. I have altered the plan back to 4 rotors due
  to airframe  refinement in X-plane  simulations. A four rotor allows
  the use of stock RX-8 internals and rotor housings which are 1/3 the
  price of 3 rotor parts. Reducing engine weight and fuel weight
  significantly reduce landing speeds.

  george grimes

  If the shaft is not one piece there are couplings :)

  Yes I know. I did it on purpose. The e-shaft couplings appear to be
 different.

  Here is the way CW did it on a four rotor. Makes more sense in many
  regards (cooling, tension bolts to name a few) but would require
  split intermediate housing. If you are making billet housing that
  would be no real problem anyway.

  The shaft may not break but one must deal with the flywheel coupling.

  Paul Lamar

  Looking at sheets 1 and 3, it would appear the e-shaft is one
 piece. It also appears that 1 and 3 fire at the same time and 2 and
 4 at the same time. with each pair 180* from the other pair. Sheet 3
 also shows what looks like a split stationary gear/main bearing
 assembly, which is required for the one piece e-shaft.

 Dale Davies

 The world record holding HP per cubic inch Offenhauser had split
 main bearing holders. The crankcase was one peice and the split main
 bearing bulkheads were fed in from the end.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offenhauser

 "One of the keys to the Offenhauser engine's success was power. A
 251.92 cubic inch
 (4,128.29 cm³) twin-cam four-cylinder racing Offy with a 15:1
 compression ratio and a
 4.28125-by-4.375-inch (108.744 × 111.1 mm) bore and stroke, could
 produce 420 hp (310 kW) at 6,600 rpm (1.77 hp per cubic inch (81
 kW/L). Other variants of the engine produced up to 3 hp per cubic
 inch (137 kW/L). Another reason for the engine's success was
 reliability; unit construction (no separate cylinder head) meant the
 engine was not vulnerable to head gasket or cylinder stud problems
 and allowed for higher cylinder pressures."

 "Before turbo boost limits, over 1,000 bhp (750 kW) could be
 attained using around 120 in Hg (44.3 psi (3.05 bar)) boost."

 Paul Lamar


 Talking Offys for gear heads.
http://home.earthlink.net/~roygmisc1/startoffy1/startoffy1.html
Thought you people may like this! :-))

Dale Davies





-- The Rotary Engine News Letter. Powered by Linux. ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube key word PaulLamar2 Copyright 1998-2012 All world wide rights reserved.