Subject: Recent flight from Everett to Medford / question for Mark mufflers
From: rotaryeng
Date: 8/30/2012, 11:53 PM
To: AAAA Put this in the To box


 This week I flew my RV-4/13BREW from Everett Wa.  to Medford  Ore. and
 back.
 Headwinds on the way down were brisk- 30 kts at 8500 feet on the way down,
 but 35 kt
 tailwind on the way back. The engine ran flawlessly but the plane is slow-
 true
 airspeed was 110 kts at 19.5 manifold pressure,5600 rpm oil temp 161 and
 coolant 170,
 fuel flow around 8 gpm. My prop is a three blade Catto, 72 dia x 88 pitch.

 For one, the plane is  over propped. I'm going to have Craig Catto cut it
 down a
 little during the winter maintenance. The other thing is that the cooling
 scoop is
 effective, but way too draggy, so I'm going to re-do it this winter.

 Another issue is my left brake line- I"ve melted it twice. It's plastic,
 and although
 it is shielded from the exhaust pipes and insulated with fiberfrax, I
 think that
 heated air from the exhaust pipes is being forced out the opening in the
 cowl where
 the brake line goes to the gear leg. That's where I have found the line
 melted. I
 want to put  a reverse scoop near the exhaust pipes to get the heated air
 out of the
 cowl, and to replace the brake line with stainless steel. Everything
 inside the cowl
 except for the brake line looks OK- I wrapped and shielded everything -
 wires,
 coolant, fuel,and oil lines. There are three NACA ducts bringing air into
 the cowl to
 cool the alternator, the coils and exhaust pipes, and an exhaust eductor
 to suck air
 through the cowl and over the muffler.

 Comments?

 Brian Trubee

 Couple of questions.
 EGT?
 Size of throttle body?
 Is the engine ported?

 The manifold pressure is very low.

 Is the air filter plugged? :)
 Are you getting cold air?

 8 GPH is 50 pounds per hour at 6.25 pounds per gallon. At a BSFC of .47
 leaned that
 is only 106 HP. At a fuel burn of .5 that is only 100 HP. If it is really
 rich and
 the BSFC is .55 and that is only 90 HP.

 You need a p-port Brian :)

 Paul Lamar


 Brian,

 As some of you know my Wheeler will be a blend of certified parts and
 experimental parts. I noticed the issues with the nylon brake lines long
 ago. I went to NAPA and bought (8) 12" standard brake lines that go on
 trucks from the hard line to the wheels. I also bought a 25 foot roll of
 3/32 brake tubing, 24 double flare fittings, and a double flare tool. Total
 for all of this was $170.00. After I got back to my plane, within 2 hours I
 had the brake lines made up from the master cylinders to the wheels. Galv
 steel line inside the cockpit, 12 inch flex at the master cylinders, at the
 turn into the wings (mine are removable) one more at the flex point of the
 gear leg, and the last one at the wheel. I don't anticipate melting my
 brake lines. This is the way my Viking was done, and I had no issues with
 my 1968 Viking until I blew the Continental up.

 My fuel and oil system will be similar. The materials are inexpensive, and
 the labor is minimal. Cheap insurance.



 Kevin Alderman

 brian,
                 This is the blind leading the blind as I have yet to depart
 the earth, but tied to a tree I get MP of 22 at 5000 rpm and from memory 24
 at 5600 rpm.  Where are you reading it from?  Neil.


 It's been a while since I did any static runs on the ground. I"d just be
 guessing at
 this point to give some numbers for static running.

 Brian Trubee


 Brian,

 You stated "...my EGT temps- they show up to 2000 at times- and above
 1800 most of the time in cruise."  I too experienced very high EGT's
 in excess of 1800* when I was using a muffler that was too
 restrictive.  Also, power was way down, but it was quiet.  ;-)  The
 high temps ended up damaging the o-rings and I had to rebuild the
 engine.  Since replacing the muffler the egt's have dropped down to
 1600 - 1650* range and power is much improved.  I suggest you examine
 and modify or replace your current muffler.

 Mark

 The best muffler for a rotary is 3 to 8 feet long about 4 to 5 inches in
 diameter.
 That gives the lowest aero drag for a given silencing. Lowest frontal
 area. Mufflers
 work by the exhaust gases rubbing on the metal surface losing kinetic
 energy to skin
 friction and losing heat to the metal surfaces. The cooler the gases in a
 pipe the
 lower the gas speed. When high speed gas exits a pipe there is a sudden
 expansion
 that causes the noise. The idea here is to cool the gases before they get
 to the end
 of the inner pipe.

 The inner tube is best done in .045 Inconnel but there is a trade off with
 thickness.
 If you make the inner tube 2 inches in diameter and use 321 SS make it
 .065 thick
 with a bunch of holes drilled in it. The outer tube can be .030" thick 321
 SS as it
 will always run cooler. Also make the front of the muffler look like this.

 Don't drill any holes for the first 8 to 10 inches. The slip stream will
 blow cooling
 air down between the coaxial tubes. At the back end make the inner tube 6
 inches
 shorter than the outer tube. That will act as an ejector to draw cooling
 air between
 the two tubes. Patent applied for:)

 A 2 inch diameter SS tube .065 thick 72 inches long will weigh about 8.8
 pounds.

 A 4 inch diameter SS tube .030 thick 72 inches long will weigh about 7.50
 pounds.

 Here is a dwg.

 A 2.5 inch inner tube and a 5 and 1/2 inch outer tube may give a little
 less back
 pressure for a weight trade off.

 Paul Lamar

   Mark ,
   From what you say and from the performance of my plane, I'm
 starting to think that the Hushpower muffler is causing too much
 back pressure and that would explain the anemic performance and
 high EGTs. What type of o-rings were you using and do you think
 that the high EGTs caused O-ring failure and how so?

   Right now I'm thinking of how I can replace the Hushpower with
 the design that Paul just put forth. Its a bit tricky hanging
 that stuff on an RV-4 and working it around the heat exchanger
 and scoop.


   Brian Trubee

 It might be melting inside.

 Here is what Mike Wills did on the RV4 although the front of the muffler
 outer tube
 is not open for cooling air. This is what gave me the idea for the coaxial
 muffler in
 the first place.

 The subtle point is; cooling the inner tube saves weight as there is a
 high temp
 metal durability trade off with weight.

 For an example Perry Mick has been running an early cast iron thermal
 reactor for
 years. They are very durable but they are heavy.

 For anther example Ed Anderson runs SS pipe hand rail with an .109" thick
   wall and
 it hardly discolors. However you don't need a motor mount as the engine
 can be
 cantilevered off the fuse with the exhaust tubes :)

 Paul Lamar

 Brian,

 I was running TES o-rings inner and outer.  The high EGT's exceeded the
 temp limit of the o-ring, allowing it to ooze out between the mating
 surfaces.  I switched to the SS handrail exhaust with a DNA muffler (no
 longer available) and haven't had any more problems, although the DNA
 muffler is not much of a muffler (pretty loud).  People comment they can
 hear me before they can see me.  I wear a Lightspeed Zulu headset.

 Mark

 Got an pictures of those O-rings? Are you sure about the section size?
 Heated silicone can crack cast iron if there is not enough room to expand.

 http://www.rbwagner.com/pages/Rbwagner.html

 Paul Lamar

 Mark,

 What kind of muffler were you using that caused all the back pressure?

 Brian Trubee

 Brian,

It was a tangential muffler.  I suspect the problem was that I ran the
outlet tube all the way through the body of the muffler to the front cover.
 It had holes all along the length of the tube.  In retrospect I don't
think the holes were big enough to let all the exhaust out.  I may try it
again later with more/larger holes.  It was made from 625 inconnel.  To
modify it would require much grinding, then re-welding.

A well-respected racer guru has warned us to be very careful with the
exhaust system design else you'll loose much HP. (He didn't mention
damaging the engine.)  Rotaries don't like back pressure.

Mark

That is very restrictive looking.
You might try a 3 rotor version of one of these. See the 3D. It was invented by Dr.

Porsche for the air cooled VW. In theory the air whirls around inside rubbing on the
outer skin.

The center tube has air flowing through it for cooling purpose so an air scope on the
front of the cowl is required. In practice a part of the outer skin opposite the
exhaust tubes catches the brunt of the energy so a skin doubler must be welded on in
this area. This Inconnel version has hundreds of hours on it.

Paul Lamar

-- The Rotary Engine News Letter. Powered by Linux. ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube key word PaulLamar2 Copyright 1998-2012 All world wide rights reserved.