Subject: Recent flight from Everett to Medford / question for Mark mufflers
From: rotaryeng
Date: 8/31/2012, 1:46 PM
To: AAAA Put this in the To box


   Brian,

   You stated "...my EGT temps- they show up to 2000 at times- and above
   1800 most of the time in cruise."  I too experienced very high EGT's
   in excess of 1800* when I was using a muffler that was too
   restrictive.  Also, power was way down, but it was quiet.  ;-)  The
   high temps ended up damaging the o-rings and I had to rebuild the
   engine.  Since replacing the muffler the egt's have dropped down to
   1600 - 1650* range and power is much improved.  I suggest you examine
   and modify or replace your current muffler.

   Mark


  The fuel flow seems correct, and coolant temps seem correct for the
  speed,
  and HP, so mixture is close. The EGTs are way too high, probably back
  pressure and perhaps too large a header diameter. And the probes are a bit
  close
   in. About 3 inches is the compromise between accurate reporting and long
  life.  Each header pipe should be exactly the same length to the
 collector.
  Put a shop  vac hose down each pipe as you build up the system and mark
 the
  length with  tape. Make the second pipe the same length. Shallow angle
 into
  the collector.  Collector about 4 diameters long. Long collector broader
 HP
  range. Short  collector higher peak HP but very short range. Header tube
 ID
  to match the  exhaust liner ID as close as possible. You want high
 velocity
  right into the  collector. Header length in any multipal of 11" to 12" to
  the
  collector. If  the muffler is close to the collector that is the end of
  tuning. And best to  have a see through muffler.

  The other problem is the 13BREW irons are from a twin turbo engine
  and have huge port runners. You want the highest possible velocity at the
  port face on the iron. That requires small runners in the manifold and
  irons.  Some builders do use turbo irons for NA road race engines, but
  those guys
  shift  well above 10,000 RPM. That is because of the big runners that
 still
  flow well  at those RPM. Those engines have no bottom end power and not
  much mid range.

  Dave Lemon blends 2 of the 3 runners and ports in a 6 port iron to make
  his E production engines. This is the same idea as the turbo irons but
   with
  more material to play with. He shifts above 10,000 RPM with a really big
  street port.

  Read this: _http://mototuneusa.com/thanx.htm_
  (http://mototuneusa.com/thanx.htm)  Look  at "High velocity porting"

  So the selection of turbo irons for an NA engine is an error in my
 opinion.
   Daryl Drummond uses the stock intake manifold gasket on 250 HP 12A GT-3
  engines.  So the runners are amazingly small. (High velocity)

  The Pport gets back runner velocity with very early opening of the intake
  port. Lots of overlap and late closing of the intake port.

  The bridge port opens even earlier than a Pport, plus you control where it
  closes by moving the closing line at the top of the port. I think you are
  stuck  so long as the turbo irons are installed, unless you add a turbo,
  which ends  most of the muffling problems.

  Rather than bridge port the irons, I would swap them for non turbo irons
 or
   add the turbo. Get on the "Nopistons" list and look at the swap and sale
  items.

  Lynn E. Hanover

   The best muffler for a rotary is 3 to 8 feet long about 4 to 5
  inches in diameter.  That gives the lowest aero drag for a given
  silencing.  Lowest frontal area.  Mufflers work by the exhaust
  gases rubbing on the metal surface losing kinetic energy to skin
  friction and losing heat to the metal surfaces.  The cooler the
  gases in a pipe the lower the gas speed.  When high speed gas
  exits a pipe there is a sudden expansion that causes the noise.

  The idea here is to cool the gases before they get to the end of
  the inner pipe.  The inner tube is best done in .045 Inconnel
  but there is a trade off with thickness.  If you make the inner
  tube 2 inches in diameter and use 321 SS make it .065 thick with
  a bunch of holes drilled in it.  The outer tube can be .030"
  thick 321 SS as it will always run cooler.  Also make the front
  of the muffler look like this.  Don't drill any holes for the
  first 8 to 10 inches.  The slip stream will blow cooling air
  down between the coaxial tubes.  At the back end make the inner
  tube 6 inches shorter than the outer tube.  That will act as an
  ejector to draw cooling air between the two tubes.  Patent
  applied for:)

   A 2 inch diameter SS tube .065 thick 72 inches long will weigh about 8.8
   pounds.

   A 4 inch diameter SS tube .030 thick 72 inches long will weigh about 7.50
   pounds.

   Here is a dwg.

   A 2.5 inch inner tube and a 5 and 1/2 inch outer tube may give a little
   less back
   pressure for a weight trade off.

   Paul Lamar

     Mark ,
     From what you say and from the performance of my plane, I'm
   starting to think that the Hushpower muffler is causing too much
   back pressure and that would explain the anemic performance and
   high EGTs. What type of o-rings were you using and do you think
   that the high EGTs caused O-ring failure and how so?

     Right now I'm thinking of how I can replace the Hushpower with
   the design that Paul just put forth. Its a bit tricky hanging
   that stuff on an RV-4 and working it around the heat exchanger
   and scoop.


     Brian Trubee

   It might be melting inside.

   Here is what Mike Wills did on the RV4 although the front of the muffler
   outer tube
   is not open for cooling air. This is what gave me the idea for the
 coaxial
   muffler in
   the first place.

   The subtle point is; cooling the inner tube saves weight as there is a
   high temp
   metal durability trade off with weight.

   For an example Perry Mick has been running an early cast iron thermal
   reactor for
   years. They are very durable but they are heavy.

   For anther example Ed Anderson runs SS pipe hand rail with an .109" thick
     wall and
   it hardly discolors. However you don't need a motor mount as the engine
   can be
   cantilevered off the fuse with the exhaust tubes :)

   Paul Lamar

   Brian,

   I was running TES o-rings inner and outer.  The high EGT's exceeded the
   temp limit of the o-ring, allowing it to ooze out between the mating
   surfaces.  I switched to the SS handrail exhaust with a DNA muffler (no
   longer available) and haven't had any more problems, although the DNA
   muffler is not much of a muffler (pretty loud).  People comment they can
   hear me before they can see me.  I wear a Lightspeed Zulu headset.

   Mark

   Got an pictures of those O-rings? Are you sure about the section size?
   Heated silicone can crack cast iron if there is not enough room to
 expand.

   http://www.rbwagner.com/pages/Rbwagner.html

   Paul Lamar

   Mark,

   What kind of muffler were you using that caused all the back pressure?

   Brian Trubee

   Oh, and also, when you changed the muffler, what kind of performance
 gains
   did you get?

   Brian Trubee



   Brian,

  I saw a big improvement, especially at WOT.  Climb rate improved, top
 speed
  improved, and EGT's dropped significantly.

  Paul,

  Attached is a picture of the exhaust I'm running now, except for the
  downpipe section has been replaced with a DNA muffler.  Sorry, its the
 best
  picture I could find of the exhaust.  I heard they quit making the DNA
  muffler.

  Mark

  I see very little advantage. It looks trick and different and that some
  times sells :)

  For the new guys this is Mark's old engine non p-ported.

  As Lynn says you need a "see through muffler". :)

  Paul Lamar

  Paul,

 All I can say is the performance was significantly improved from the
 tangential design.  Maybe when I run out of other things to do I'll build
 one of your design and hang it under the fuse and see if it performs any
 better.  On a side note, it sure would be nice to have a dyno to use to
 test our theories.

 Mark

 If you have the room under the cowl you can use one of these tuned
 versions.

 If you go with an 8 inch can and 6 inch tube cl radii then overall will be
 12 inches.
 You should have room for that in a 48 inch cowl.

 You will get max HP at 7500 RPM and good BSFC from 5000 to 7000 RPM with
 the magic 32
 inch runner length all in theory.

 You can fine tune it be moving it in and out relative to the engine by an
 inch or two.

 If square tubes are used any cl radii is possible because it is made from
 flat sheet.
 No bends are required and it is easy to fab.

 Paul Lamar

 Paul,

I would have to take some measurements to see if it would fit.  Yes, the
cowl is 48" wide, but there are quite a few other items that need to fit in
that space too.  ;-)

Mark


-- The Rotary Engine News Letter. Powered by Linux. ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube key word PaulLamar2 Copyright 1998-2012 All world wide rights reserved.