http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasoline_gallon_equivalent
RBerglund
What is missing in this chart is BTU's per pound therefore it is over simplified.
Also some of the gaseous fuels mentioned require heavy pressure vessels and the electric vehicles require heavy
batteries. It takes HP to accelerate and to climb hills. Extra weight is counter productive.
Not to mention the natural resource use and recycling cost of the batteries.
This site is not the big picture.
Paul Lamar
This Wikipedia article is confusing and misleading. I think it was prepared by lawyers of the NRDC. Engineering uses
fuel heat value per unit weight to compare fuels and when weight cannot be used an equivalent heat value is used. I
could not make sense using the numbers in the article.
Because Wikipedia is an open forum someone qualified could fix it. The Rotary
Robert Young
Engine News Letter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
You Tube
http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas
Copyright 1998-2013 All world wide rights reserved.