Hi rotaryeng
Can someone please assist with a technical question regarding a RX8 4
port low power manual engine 190 bhp engine will be used in helicopter.
We would like to find out what the rotational inertia is so a damper can
be designed for the pulsation
Also can someone clue me up regarding the purchase of aluminium end
plates, where to purchase and what should the cost be,
Would very much appreciate your assistance
Kind regards George
Kind Regards George Crooks
I have no idea on the rotational inertia but here is a coupling design
that has evolved from years of experience.
Aluminum end plates are available from Racing Beat.
http://www.racingbeat.com/RX7-1993-1995/Rotor-Intermediate-Housings.html
They are peripheral exhaust and do not use the RX8 side exhaust.
In that case you might as well sell the 4 port RX8 engine and buy a 3rd
gen RX7 engine and base it on those rotor housings, e-shaft and rotors.
I recommend p-port intake as well. In that case you will have 250 HP to
work with at 7500 RPM.
Paul Lamar
--
George, If you have a 3D program I can send you an IGES of the coupler.
Paul Lamar
I was told by a relative, working in the aeronautical engineering field,
that helicopters are highly complex and extremely difficult to design,
and the people that are known for being able to design a working
helicopter are very few, and known to everybody in the industry.
A French engineer having proven his expertise in helicopter design had
an argument with his employer, in certain businesses, nobody would hire
you if you leave another company in the field, as this may result in
transmitting know-how, patents and other industrial secrets to
competitors, and when the Spanish govt knew this, it was in the 60's,
they hired that expert who built several models of helicopters, if I
remember well, under the mark 'AISA', for Industrial Aeronautics in Spanish.
Around 1986, I made a car trip for reasons of work from Madrid to Oviedo
(Asturias) and while passing next to a wreckage-recycling lot, I saw one
of these helicopters standing among the many cars there.
I ignore completely the final destination of this piece, and as roads
changed since then, it would be extremely difficult finding the place
again, but a similar thing seems having happened with at least one of
the prototypes of Wankel powered Corvettes, that was bought by a British
writer when it was about to be put into pieces, and is shown in local
Wankel lover's meetings, but never making the engine run, previously,
two GM Wankel powered Corvettes were at exhibition in the Ford's
Dearborn Museum in Detroit, at least, it were there in March 1988.
I read somebody stating that these Wankel Powered Corvettes, one with
two, and the other with four rotors, won't be allowed today going on
roads or streets, as none of two met the rules about headlights.
Regards. Salut †
Jose Gros-Aymerich Madrid, Spain
Hello Jose Gros-Aymerich, and all who may be interested
I trust my mail finds you well in health and in good spirits
There are monuments of all kind in backyards all over the world, it goes
without saying that if I fail to plan properly then it can be said that
I have planned to fail.
With that said there is a poem that suits the situation it is called
"the bridge builder" available on the internet and worth a read if you
like simple wisdom, if not and only here for self
benefit, my suggestion is don't bother
Projects fail for all sorts of reasons and I accept your comments as
very valid and as you might notice that failure happens to companies
much, much larger than my self
I am seeking information and contacts; there are a number of independent
aeronautical engineers over the world that have experience a variety of
areas, the helicopter I am building is a Scorpion 2 seater for which
having been of 1970s technology it was a good helicopter with many being
built from kits and for sale on the internet today, they started out
with an outboard boat engine and grew from there , there are only just a
few modification that I intend to carry out which is engine and rotor.
Right up to today popular helicopters have the power of the engine
transmitted through V belts, which have failed in the past and who know
about the future.
The Scorpion has V belts driving both the main rotor and the tail rotor;
I plan to make the aircraft safer by employing much safer means of
driving the rotors, and more pilot friendly.
The engineer that I am working with or will be in January will be
designing the reduction box for the helicopter , he has done this
previously for a helicopter fitted with a diesel engine, he has advised
me to change the main rotor system to one which is pilot operator friendly,
which is a fully articulated system, he has also successfully deigned a
fully articulated system previously so thus my enquirys about the
rotational inertia of the Mazda rotary engine and again regarding the
one rotor turbo.
I have met a man who trades under the name Billet INC, (he has a
website) who builds some lovely rotary stuff a little expensive for me,
but good stuff; he is a Drag Racer and builds for that industry.
His rotary engines hold world records and as a hands on motor mechanic
for many years I can appreciate his work. He suggested that I take a
look at the single rotor rotary saying he could build a turbo engine and
get 200hp out of one rotor, most twin rotors can obtain 400hp according
to the Internet and apart from the engine I saw on the rotaryeng site I
have not located another and at Paul's suggestion I have e-mailed
Richard Sohn hoping he might answer some questions for me.
The intent of my story is to obtain options that I can consider ,
possibly split the engineering process between one or more qualified
people and then bring the project together under the most appropriate
person to do the final stress calculations balancing , ground resonance
effects and the engine rotor resonance , if someone knows the rotational
inertia it will save me possibly pulling an engine apart to measure
everything depending on the decisions I make which will have to be made
by January to fit in with my current planning . I am open to
constructive criticism and advice so feel free to make comment wherever
it might be helpful or beneficial to the project, just like the “bridge
builder” it is not just for me but for the people who come behind.
Kind regards
And best wishes
George
Hi George!: you've been very kind in your response to my note, but I
missed completely the facts, it's not you designing an helicopter from
zero yourself and alone, but building an already proven project; as the
goal in my comment was making some mild mental pressure towards
consulting experts, and taking the things slowly and with lots of
wisdom, you've show you're already doing this by your response, thus, I
just want pointing that I offer you my best wishes for success in
constructing and flying a homebuilt helicopter.
By the way: the Spanish prototypes I cited, all them flew successfully,
just the whole program was discontinued because budgetary reasons, equal
as the British politician Shackleton? send to wreckage the TSR2, or
something like, supersonic bomber airplane project. Salut
Jose Gros-Aymerich Madrid, Spain
Please check out the Schweitzer (Hughes 269 & 300) which have had the
main rotor gearbox driven by 8 V belts since 1960. The belt drive also
functions as the clutch between the engine and the trans. There is a
movable idler pulley, which was originally hand operated and later
electrified, that takes up the belt slack when it is time to bring the
main and tail rotor up to speed. To the best of my knowledge there has
never been a failure with this drive. The helicopter will fly with only
3 of the 8 belts. It also provides good dampening between the Lycoming
4 cyl. and the trans. There is also a quill shaft between the engine
and the drive pulley which provides addition torsion isolation. The
quill shaft has crowned spines at either end which allows the soft
mounted engine to move around some. All in all, it is a rugged system
with hundreds of thousands of hours (including a few years as the
military's primary trainer) and no real failures.
A belt drive for the tail rotor (Scorpion) is probably not a good idea.
Gary Knutson
--
George,
If I remember correctly the 269 had a 180 hp engine.
It will be easy enough to get 180 hp out of a rotary engine.
A less expensive experience would be to obtain a 269 airframe for
testing purposes and later on
Use the learned technology to develop your final goal.
Initially you would not have to fly it, just tether it to the ground as
most helicopter manufactures do for a couple hundred hours.
This would reduce heart burn, and frustration considerable as you might
be able to test one component at a time starting with the engine.
Not only that but I could go to school on your dollar having thought on
occasion of adapting the 269 with a standard all aluminum RX.
Just kidding of course! (EX rotary wing flight test pilot)
Milo
The Rotary Engine News Letter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net
You Tube
http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas
Copyright 1998-2013 All world wide rights reserved.