If 800HP is required, the old method is large displacement. Take 1000CID
for example. The next way as per F1 because of the rules in the past is
to rev the engine to the moon. The large displacement x its RPM divided
by the small displacement gives the required RPM of the small engine.
Basically the same air flow per minute. The other way is to supercharge
the engine and push the large displacement air through the small engine
at a lower RPM. This way is a bit easier on parts. Just a matter of air
and fuel. It is not quite this simple but close to it. Two stroke, four
stroke or rotary does not matter.

Dale Davies


The Rotary Engine News Letter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net.
You Tube http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas.
Copyright 1998-2013 All world wide rights reserved.



Thank you for your words.

I think about extremely charged air.

so It could be some kind of mixture of super charger and turbo charge.

and diesel fuel injection. my aim is testing how much we can put power on small size. so it's not matter at all.

but I hope to know where will be weakest point. so I can redesign rotor and housing. but about bolt. I think it will be less problem. because we can use stronger bolt instead. in my experience most common bolt was not high tension steel. so we can easily use it. or if it damaged on running. it very cheap and easy to change and fix it.

but If damage on rotor housing itself It cost big money. because I will use inconel for that. so I must spend new 10k$ for that. so I hope I can predict future damage.

Inconel make much higher working temperature.  so I hope my new engine working at air cooling situations. It make much more fuel efficiency.

P_Bear.


The Rotary Engine News Letter. Powered by Linux.
ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net.
You Tube http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas.
Copyright 1998-2013 All world wide rights reserved.