Subject: Welding the cross counter flow rads.
From: "rotaryeng@earthlink.net" <rotaryeng@earthlink.net>
Date: 1/18/2016, 2:12 PM
To: A10-me-earthlink



    The dodge 1500 truck rad core is 31 5/8" x 19 3/16" x 1", wouldn't that give around 600 cubic inches? Or will that be doubled by having 2 of them in the cross counterflow? The newsletter reply below is showing 465 cubic inches for that rad,did I pick the correct rad measurements? Trying to size a rad to fit the cowl of p-port rx8. Laying down vs upright on the cool side of cowl.
https://www.radiatorexpress.com/product.asp?part=2001+DODGE+RAM+1500+PICKUP++-+5%2E9+liter+V8+RADIATOR+STOCK+REPLACEMENT%2C+31+X+19+CORE&part_id=218342&aaia_id=1366590



    The oil cooler we have is CXRacing with core of 13" x 9" x 2" which is only 198 cubicinch. I read an old reply from Neil Unger that around 300 cubic inch for 250hp is good for oil cooling?
http://www.cxracing.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=CXR&Product_Code=OC-248-30-AN10&Category_Code=OILC

    -Matt Boiteau

    - Matt

    On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 4:05 PM, paul lamar <rotaryeng@earthlink.net <mailto:rotaryeng@earthlink.net> <mailto:rotaryeng@earthlink.net <mailto:rotaryeng@earthlink.net>>> wrote:



        Cross counter flow is a more effective heat exchanger.

        Here is the sequence for welding the rads to make a cross counter
        flow heat exchangers.

        Butt tig weld the in and out tanks first by cutting off all tabs on
        the rads.

        Don't weld the in and out tubes on yet.

        They will be marked for position on the tanks while on the aircraft.

        Then the large holes for the tubes will be cut and then the tubes
        will be welded over the holes. The tank design will vary depending on
        cool side mounting or bottom mounting. The TTC is a bottom mount.
        Most other aircraft use a cool side mount. The 3 rotor allows longer
        rads to be used. Put the diffuser between the rads and the engine.
        See my book How to Cool your Wankel for more info.

        After the tanks are done (with out the holes and tubes) bolt the
        rads together with the wood strips leaving 1/2 to 3/8 of an inch
        between in and out tanks.

        The idea here they must not touch each other. The wood strips are
        heat insulators between the two rads.

        Then weld an aluminium strip 1/2" to 3/8" wide at the other end.
        Finish by boxing in the other end (the front end).

        Weld on them some and let the rads cool some what. They are brazed
        together at only 1100 F so it is important to not get them too hot.
        Wet rags around the ends of the fins and tubes might help.

        Here are a bunch of pictures attached. The JPGs were Dodge Neon rads
        and not the truck rads. The TTC rads will be welded soon.

        Apparently when Mercedes owned Chrysler they implemented some up to
        date heat exchanger technology. IMHO Chrysler rads are now the best
        from an efficiency point of view I have found so far. Honda also uses
        up to date tech but they are more expensive.


        Paul Lamar



        What about a dual pass rad already done?
http://www.jegs.com/i/Allstar-Performance/049/ALL30048/10002/-1

        -Matt Boiteau


        It will probably work but you will be paying a weight and drag penalty.
        I don't know how much on the drag penalty. We don't have any comparison data
        on the drag yet. The weight of the core with water will be at least
        150% of the cross counter flow Dodge truck rads.

        Paul Lamar

        For maximum efficiency, you don't want to use the flow pattern described in
         their (Allstar's) text, use the pattern from Paul's book. The top core (or first core
        exposed to cooling air) is the second core the coolant flows through.

        This better utilizes the Delta/T thermal transfer to the cooling air flow. Read Paul's
        book for counter cross flow cooling theory.

        C. Smith

        Craig, can you send me that Allstar text. I found their web site but I can't find anything
        about that. Apparently they use two rows of one inch tubes . The Dodge truck rad is one
        row of .7 inch tubes.

        http://www.allstarperformance.com/instructions.htm

        In theory one could cut the All Star rad apart into a top and bottom for a cross counter flow
        reconfiguration. That would give more core volume if two Dodge truck cores were
        not enough core volume . Slightly less efficient however.


        The basic idea is you want as large a frontal area you can fit in the cowling with core
        volume of about 500  inches. The Dodge truck core are about 465 cubic
        inches and will probably work with 250 HP. We now have about 930 cubic inches
        in the time to climb rad which I am guessing will be good for about 500 HP.

        I suspect the time to climb cross counter flow rad is not enough core volume for 650 HP and
        we will have to spray cold water on the assembly.

        We used to think we needed 650 cubic inches for 250 HP and that was before we discovered
        the the much improved Kays & London wedge diffuser.

        Ian in Perth Oz did some experimenting  with a Kays & London  S shape diffuser lying
        on it side and was able to reduce the size of the air intake to 10 to 15%
        of the core frontal area. That, in theory, reduces the cooling drag. Ian  routinely flies
        around the outback.

        Ian has  built two RV6's powered by rotaries. The first one crashed when a hose
        blew off a rad with out a bead on one of the tubing ports.

        Paul Lamar

    Do we have any more pictures of Ian in Perth Oz, S shape diffuser lying on it side ?

      -Matt Boiteau

    None with the cowl off.

    Paul Lamar

The problem with dual and triple pass radiators is that they use the
same air temperature across the entire surface. Coolant flow rate
will be high which is good for turbulent flow unless they use a double
or triple core. The cross counter flow lets the coolant spread out
across the entire surface area in a single row radiator. Then turns
after one pass and returns through the second core. The hot coolant
in the first core is cooled by warm air used to cool the cooler coolant
in the second core. Same "frontal" and surface area as a single radiator
with a two row core but should give a higher delta T. Should provide
better cooling in marginal operating conditions. For space constraints
where the thickness would not pose a problem you could build a three
pass cross counter flow.

Dale Davies

The coldest air goes through the coolest core first. That maximises the
average temperature differences to maximise the efficiency of
the heat exchanger. Heat transfer rate is directly proportional
to average  temperature difference. All this is covered in my book How to Cool
Your Wankel.

Dale please add your new message to the bottom of the forwarded message.
Like this. Make it look like this message.

Paul Lamar

    The Rotary Engine News Letter. Powered by Linux.
    If you want off the list PLEASE let me know and I will
    remove  you.  ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
    You Tube http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas
    Copyright 1998-2016 All world wide rights reserved.