Subject: Latest TTC engine pictures.
From: "rotaryeng@earthlink.net" <rotaryeng@earthlink.net>
Date: 4/1/2016, 10:17 AM
To: A10-me-earthlink




     If you see something that does
  not     look right     please let me know.

     Paul Lamar

  Paul,
  It looks  like you could take advantage of the turbine exhaust thrust
  by  aiming the pipe rearward.  (the waste pipe also!)
  Barry  Bordes

  True but at this
  point we are just trying to get it together so we can
  run it.  Jim Mederer flew up for
  an inspection and insisted we needed an oil cooler.
  He told us the warrantee  was void unless we
  put one in so now we are  doing it to keep
  him happy. We are using a 11" by 18" by 2"
  Setrabe  AN -16 fittings in and out. It will
  be here Thursday. Cost $600.

  It is no where near big enough for continuous
  650 HP use but both Dan and
  I believe five  gallons of oil won't get very hot in 91 seconds. That is
  all  we need to get the record.

  Most of the oil coolers I can
  find today are poorly designed by being
  too  thick and not large enough in frontal area. This includes
  the  Setrabe. It is like they did not read
  the bible of heat exchangers
  "Compact  Heat Exchangers" by Kays and London or let alone my
  book  "How to Cool Your Wankel".

   Mistrale got it  right back in 2009 but I do not know their
  oil cooler supplier, I wish I did.

  However, we are prepared to  spray a lot of water on it for evaporative  cooling effect if needed.

  --------------------------------------------------------------

  We bought a Setrab 11 by 18 by
  2 inches thick. Not optimum by a long
  shot  but it is an oil cooler.

  Here is what it looks like mounted under the
  cross counter flow  water cooling system. It
  will add half a gallon of oil which will
  delay oil heating by 15 to 20% :-)

  Paul Lamar

Paul,
If you have any excess thermo capacity in that large water radiator you might use a water to oil exchanger to good avail.

Barry Bordes

Excess water cooling  is an unlikely event in this case. We will probably have to hose it down with total loss water :-) The water gets hot much faster than the oil as there is way less of it. Maybe as little as a gallon and a half total.

However in the case of the oil we have a five gallon oil tank and there is not much oil in the engine at any one time. Just what the bearings will need and a little oil in the rotors for cooling.
The oil squirter’s for the rotor cooling are only .125" diameter max. One can't get gallons per minute through those size holes. Even at 150 PSI.

In general water to oil heat exchangers are bad ideas as you are putting all your cooling eggs in one basket :-) Oil is one third the cooling.

Paul Lamar

Paul,

Are you putting an air/oil separator on the vent tube from the tank? We built one for Steadfast that drained back to the case. Basic can with baffles, but we filled it with copper scrub pads. The air passing through the scrub pads condensed the oil and our oil losses out the vent went to almost nothing.
Larry CHilds


Yes check those pictures on your cell phone :-)

Here they are again.

Sounds like a good idea. Too late for this project as we got to get
it running soon. Remember it only runs for 90 seconds.

Come to think of it we could use
a total oil loss system. Forget all this oil cooler stuff. I doubt seriously
we would use 5 gallons of oil squirting it through two 1/8th in holes
in 91 seconds. Think of it as a smoke generator at an air show :-)

Paul Lamar

The Rotary Engine free News Letter. Powered by Linux.
If you want off the list PLEASE let me know and I will
remove  you.  ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
You Tube http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas
Copyright 1998-2016 All world wide rights reserved.