Subject: I was not happy with todays run up
From: paul lamar
Date: 6/17/2016, 10:07 AM
To: A10-Me-Earthlink


        First our static engine RPM was only 5200 RPM.

        The 82 inch prop was turning  only 1730 RPM
        at 5200 RPM so the prop tips are only going 415 MPH.
        Normally they get closer to Mach One at static RPM.

        The 82 inch diameter static prop RPM IMHO should be higher.
        I suspect the exhaust manifold by pass one inch hole is too
        large. Our boost was only 5 psi. IMHO that should be closer
        to 20 psi.  5 psi is about the boost you get in a stock
        1995, 280 HP RX7 turbo.

        We have a couple of heavy duty platform scales and
        if we measure the landing gear weights we can calculate
        the the prop torque and hence the HP.

        We can also measure the static thrust with a calibrated garage
        door spring I have.

        I suspect the engine was not tuned for prop load.

        We know the mixture was too lean as we richened
        it up and got another 1000 RPM when it was 4000 RPM.

        We got it so rich there was raw fuel in the exhaust
        so it caught fire after we shut it off. Fortunately no
        damage to the airplane. Quick response by a
        few people with fire extinguishers close by.

        We also found the waste gate was beginning to open
        at this modest boost level. Very very strange!!!

        There are a few things we can try. IMHO make
        that hole in the manifold smaller or do away
        with it altogether.

        Nils Castillo has been our Motec guy and he is doing
        wonderful work. The Motec system is rather easy to
        tune as there is a PC USB interface. Unfortunately it
        needs to be tuned when the prop is not stalled.

        What would be better is a manual mixture and waste
        gate controls on the instrument panel complete
        with LCD displays of O2, MAP and waste gate position.
        Basically a cockpit PC tap into the Motec. Perhaps a tablet ap
        would do the trick.

        So far the water cross counter flow cooling system is working great
        except I suspect we still have steam pockets. It is labeled engine
        temperature in the data log attached and never got over
        106 degrees F. The sensor is in the hot pipe coming
        out of the engine. Obviously we still have modest HP.

        The oil temperature is a little above room temperature
        and we ran the engine today six times in the space
        of two hours. It takes a lot to heat 4 gallons of oil.

        Paul Lamar

        Paul,  That sounds very much like a rotary.  Sooo close and yet
   troubles.
        Makes me feel better at least with all the grief I had to wade through.
        Neil.

        The fundamental problem is you don't know the prop load until you
        get the prop on there and fly it. It is a software problem.

        If the EFI measured a wide band O2 sensor and adjusted the
        mixture accordingly that might work better than using a dyno
        to set the mixture. I don't know if a Motec or the one you
        are using will do that.

        A carb measures the air flow into the engine and adjusts the
        mixture accordingly.

        All automotive systems use a mass airflow sensor to measure
        the air flow and air temperature into the engine.

        The air temperature in a turbo installation changes rapidly
        as the turbo speeds up. The air is heated as it is compressed.

        Check out this chart.

        We do not have a mass air flow sensor on the TTC engine.
        So the Motec uses intake manifold pressure and temperature
        to adjust the mixture. I don't think that works as well as a mass
        airflow sensor. It might be hard to find a mass airflow sensor
        that could handle 650 HP.

        Tracy did the same thing in the air but the feed back was too crude
   so it
        could take up to a year to get it right.

        I could be wrong about all this and our main problem is that
        manufactured hole
        in the exhaust manifold.  Kyle Mohan that runs a 800HP 3 rotor in the
        in the drift competition tells me holes in the exhaust manifold is
        old school :-)


        Paul Lamar

        19 years ago able Ibarra got 500 HP out of a turbo two rotor.
        Then he got as much as 800.

        NOS of course.

        This was way back in 1997

        Able Ibarra  lives in Riverside Ca. His dad owned a muffler shop in LA.

        He was years ahead of Jim M and knows a lot more about high power
   rotaries.

        84 inches of Hg!!!!!! at 800 HP.

        That is about 20 psi boost. (off my chart :-))
        We currently only have 5 psi boost.
         We should hire him.

        Never the less it will be fixed.

        Paul Lamar

   Did RB dyno the engine on alcohol?
   Dale Davies

   Yes

  Paul Lamar

It would be more typical to see higher revs and less thrust from a
stalled prop. Less work being done allows more revs.

Lynn E. Hanover

Every pilot knows the RPM pick's up and the acceleration increases
half way down the runway as the prop becomes un-stalled.

   Paul Lamar


The Rotary Engine free News Letter. Powered by Linux. If you want off
the list PLEASE let me know and I will remove  you.  ACRE NL web
site. http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas
Copyright 1998-2016 All world wide rights reserved.