Subject: Reduce the heat loss to the coolant by half.
From: paul lamar
Date: 8/2/2016, 3:05 AM
To: A10-Me-Earthlink


   Double the thickness of the hard steel liner in the rotor housing.
   This will result in a large reduction in fuel burn. BSFC.

   A simple change that Mazda could do on the production line.


   Paul Lamar

   Hi Paul,
   How does a thicker liner give a reduced fuel burn; what is the theory here?

   Dave in Perth

   One wants to keep as much heat (temperature)  in the combustion chamber
   as possible.
   The steel liner acts as insulation as unusual as that sounds.
   The heat transfer rate of steel is much much lower than that of
   aluminum. So one would want to increase the thickness of that insulation
   to prevent the aluminum from carrying  away all the temperature.

   As the combustion chamber rotates toward the exhaust port it is exposed
   to new areas of the steel liner which are cooler and more and more
   temperature  is lost. When one cools off a high pressurized container
   the pressure is reduced in that container. This pressure is acting on
   the face of the rotor and that is what generates the torque so potential
   torque is lost.

   (P1 X V1) / T1 = (P2 X V2)/ T2

   Change any one of those terms in the first part and that  will change
   the second part.

   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_laws

   It is a fundamental law of physics.

   Note: in this attached chart stainless steel  is 1/3 that of cast iron.
   That is why Mazda
   needs to find out how to make the rotors out of SS instead of cast iron.
   SS would be good for the liner as well if it were possible to chrome
   plate it.

   Also note: In the heat transfer units it is

   watts / (meters X Temp)

   so the thicker material the less heat is transfered.

   Thermal details like this affect the BSFC of all engines.

   Hold a piece of steel on a grinding wheel with your bare hands.
   Then hold a piece of the same size SS and report back :-)

   Paul Lamar


   What is the heat transfer and cost of a ceramic coated rotor versus a
   stainless steel rotor?

   As temperatures increase of the combustion chamber and sliding surfaces,
   what is expected to be the next weak link?  I suspect carbon buildup
   would go down but will seal lubrication become an issue?

   Speaking of seal lubrication, which paper addresses why the apex seals
   aren't lubricated from inside the rotor?


   Aron Buster

   "What is the heat transfer and cost of a ceramic coated rotor versus a
   stainless steel rotor?"

   I have no idea. Who is doing ceramic coating on rotors? I would hesitate
   to use it because if some of it came off it would destroy the wear
   surface of an expensive rotor housing.

   The  proven Iannetti silicon nitride seals will tolerate double the
   temperature of an iron seal.
   I have never heard of one breaking up in 17 years of this news letter.
   They are
   solid silicon nitride with fiber reinforcement supposedly.

   The main function of the apex seal oil is cooling the iron apex seals.
   Synthetic oil will tolerate
   twice the temperature of organic oils. Turbine oils are better than that.

   If you use synthetic oil there is no carbon build up.

   "Speaking of seal lubrication, which paper addresses why the apex seals
   aren't lubricated from inside the rotor?"

   You got me there. Do you know if there is such a paper?
   It might work but the holes would have to be tiny and subject to
   plugging up if some one used organic oils.

   Also the amount of oil required is a function of horse power.
   I don't know how one would control that with out a computer.
   Mixing with the fuel already does that. More fuel, more oil, more power.


---------------------------------------------------------------------

   BTW the stock oil "injector pump" is not really a pump at all.
   It is an oil distribution device. The oil is transfered to the
   compression chamber when the chamber is lower pressure than atmospheric.
   The so-called injectors are open to the atmospheric pressure.

   If one turbo charges the RX7 engine less apex seal oil will find its way
   to the apex seals. Mazda themselves made that mistake when they turboed
   the rotary back in the late 80's and all of the 90's.
   If you have one of those you better be mixing oil with the fuel :-)

   Some people on the Internet get it wrong. They incorrectly assume the
   RX7 "pump" AKA OMP is fed from the high pressure oil system. Not true
   except possibly for the RX8. It is fed from a gravity fed atmospheric
   pressure oil reservoir. To prove it take the RX7 "pump" off and turn the
   engine over with the starter and see if oil squirts out of the supply hole.


   Paul Lamar


   Hi Paul

   I have looked quite a bit into ceramic coatings to act as thermal
   insulation layer and as part of that I have talked to several world
   experts on the subject matter

   There are actually quite a few options for applying thermal coatings
   onto metal surfaces and for the most part they can be applied to many
   materials even some some low temp materials. Most are applied with very
   high velocity impregnations. These nozzles are cnc programmed to apply a
   pattern to get complete coverage

   The issue is that I have not found any coaters who are able to guarantee
   that the coating thickness will be uniform across the surface being
   coated. This means than for the most part, the ceramic surface will need
   to be lapped post coating process. This would make this process coast
   prohibitive for low volume applications. Even for high volume
   applications, it will be fairly expensive process because the thermal
   insulating ceramics also tend to be extremely hard to to lap.

   With that said, if Mazda proceeds with releasing a new rotary, I am
   pretty confident that they will utilize some sort of ceramic insulating
   layer to help meet the more stringent regulations

   Regards
   Simon Saba

   Hi Simon,
   The rotor would only need to be coated on the three outer surfaces,
   wouldn't it ?
     would they actually need to be lapped ? doesn't only the apex seal
   contact the liner ?
   Chris Hoskins.


   Don't do it Chris. You won't even notice it as it will be less than 1%
   lower fuel burn.

   If a small part comes off you can kiss your engine good bye.

   Also make sure you have a good air filter.

   Paul Lamar


   Hi Chris,

   Paul is absolutely right
   You can coat on the opposite surface (ie external surfaces surrounding the chamber) and indeed you will not need to lap if on this surface instead of the internal surface. It will still add insulation, however, because of the excellent conductivity of the metal, the heat will conduct sideways (ie radially) on the side plates, and axially and rotationally on the housing. This will reduce the effectiveness of adding the insulation. Certainly there will be an improvement but very small relative to insulating the internal surfaces

   The most effective, but unfortunately most expensive, is to insulate the inside surfaces. On piston engines, there are several aftermarket services that will coat the piston top and the inside surface of the dome and it helps keep the heat inside by adding insulation and reflecting radiated heat back in the piston. It would be an interesting experiment for someone to coat the outer surfaces of the rotor and quantify the impact.

   Simon Saba

   As long as there is no possibility of it coming  off.

   A piston engine will tolerate more debris.

   GM patented a multi piece rotor.

   Paul Lamar

   Some piston engine manufacturers are coating cylinder walls with a ceramic for low wear. I think Ford is doing an aluminum V8 now.
   The 26B Lemans engine was ceremet coated to help BSFC and wear. I do not know what development issues they may have had with that process. Mazda must have had patents that describe the process. I believe the rotor house and the side housings were coated. I would be interested to know if they sprayed directly onto an aluminum housing or whether they modified the steel liner for the ceremet thickness.
   Dale Davies


   That was silicon carbide applied with a detonation gun. I guess you could call it ceramic.
   It must be diamond ground. A very expensive procedure. Mazda tried Nikasil and it was not
   as good as detonation coating. Works better on cylinders.


   The Ford may have been nikasil.

   Nikasil is a trademarked electro deposited lipo philic nickel matrix silicon carbide coating
   for engine components, mainly piston engine cylinder liners.

   Paul Lamar


By the diagram in the Lemans P-port illustration it appears the ceremet was applied
directly to the aluminum housing without a steel liner.

Dale Davies



   The Rotary Engine free News Letter. Powered by Linux. If you want off
   the list PLEASE let me know and I will remove  you.  ACRE NL web
   site. http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas
   Copyright 1998-2016 All world wide rights reserved.