| Subject: Better illustration for the squish flow problem solution |
| From: paul lamar |
| Date: 1/16/2017, 9:23 AM |
| To: A10-Me-Earthlink |
I did a little more work on the 3D's with a paint program. I think this is a solution to the slightly worse fuel consumption. It should make the rotary equal to the piston engine on fuel burn, In a way this simulates the piston engine in the way it compresses the incoming charge. Paul Lamar Paul, At Norton we did similar work but we used brake pipes in a crossover configuration from the side walls of the end plates, on our twin rotor machine. We was trying to improve the idle. We for over a two decade also used butterfly's mounted within the housing, we PTFT?? coated the S.U butterfly due to them and the throttle jamming closed when the housing contracted on cooling. Bob Rowley. The butterflies have that problem. You need slop in there and then they leak when closed. That is interesting. Did the brake pipes work? The main reason Mazda went with side exhaust ports was to improve the idle. Every time it missed you got a dollop of unburned hydrocarbons. It was normal for earlier RX's to miss every once in a while at idle. Paul Lamar Paul, The Crossover pipes showed some improvement on tick over, but we did not have the benefit of computer models to any great extent even in 1983 ( these test dates ). We put closing valves on the later test so we could check with or without. We only set the drill zones for the pipe on a sort of best guess fashion, the pipes could be switched to the other rotor, or switched to itself. Please see attached a typical MIRA test day for me, please state "Rowley Archives" You may wish to Know that we shipped a Norton to HD in and I spent 3 week in a sort of exchange riding HD and HD testers riding the Norton (circa 1987) Regards Bob Rowley "Rowley Archives" attached. Up untill the advent of CFD we had no idea what the air was doing inside the rotary. Better CFD is the key to improving the fuel consumption. What does HD stand for Bob? Is that Harley Davidson? :-) I sold them some road test systems before 1987. Paul Lamar Hi: thanks for the good information. For sure you're aware that the Norton two rotor engines,
294 cc per chamber, had only one rotor firing at idle, the other just pumping air.
Thanks, have a good season, best regards, + Salud
Jose Gros-Aymerich
Madrid, Spain