Subject: Building Projects
From: paul lamar
Date: 2/13/2017, 1:44 AM
To: A10-Me-Earthlink



Hi Paul, we have had a couple of Visions built at Serpentine. One had
  a Subaru engine, reg VH WRX, and flew OK, though the airframe was a
  bit heavy. The other is still under construction and has 6 inches
  added to the cabin height as the builder is about 6’6” tall. Rs, Dave
  McCandless  in Perth

  Dave: You don't have contact with the builders or possible contact
  details of the flyable version of the Vision.?The builders group is
  not a very active and only a small group sharing there experience.
  Will contact you in private for the details. Forgive me Paul for
  reaching out on this group ,as to get hold of our family of builders.
  Much appreciated.

  Le Roux Breytenbach

  The Internet  and this  newsletter never seizes to amaze me. Le Roux
  and Dave are just across the Indian ocean from each other. And I am
  on the exact opposite side of the globe :-)

  You guys can use the newsletter. I am sure there may be one or two
  more Visions being built on here.

  Paul Lamar

  Hi Paul and Le Roux, Nice Depiction of the Oceans. Give me a day or
  two and maybe I can get some pics. The guy who built the flyer has
  passed away, but the airplane is still around. Rs,

  Dave McCandless  in Perth

  I have Vision plans. But I've never had the time to actually build
  it.

  David Mikesell San Jose, California

  Are the wings hot wired foam David?

----------------------------------------------------------------------





Back in 2011 Pierre Swanepoel from S. Afica (I think) was building a 13b
  powered vision. Here are some 3D's and pictures

  Paul Lamar

  Nope, sheet that is cut to shape, then glassed. I did the project
  they sold the VHS tape called the  "Totally Useless Box", it is the
  primer to get you used to the techniques in building the Vision.

  David Mikesell

  This is great. This looks like the cheapest way of getting into
  aviation.  With or without a pilots license All you need to do is
  solo. While you are building this airplane will locally acquired
  materials. I hope blue Styrofoam is available all over the world.
  Other than the gear box the 13B rotary is near free.

  Paul Lamar

  Yes the Vision Ex what i am building is the only way for me to get
  into owning my own plane at a affordable price.The Vision EX has a
  longer wingspan that is more forgiven in weight if you are building
  on the heavy side of the composite techniques.Paul is right you
  source your building material according to the specs ,locally at a
  composites shop."Pay as you go " at your own time and build in your
  garage at your own pace.In ZA you apply for a builders number at the
  CAA (Civil Aviation Authority) then a "approved person" vissit you
  and sign and stamped your building logs.


  Paul i have got hold of   Pierre Swanepoel Vision #338 project and
  the fuselage will be finished in this year.He is retired now That is
  how i came to the rotary newsletter as the emails that you send and i
  has found in his files between the plans.What a pleasure to build ,
  the plans is simple , and no "rocket science" to do basic lay ups
  and vacuum bagging with carbon fiber or glass.


  Steve Rahm the designer of the Vision was a real plane builder and
  that reflects in the design and plans.Short sweat and simple in your
  garage with no special tools. The main reason why there is not many
  completed is you must sacrifice building hours and "sweat capital".I
  know there is a builders in the newsletter that builds Cozy"s and
  Tango's and Glassair's and i am inspired by you Dave M you will make
  my day in finding a Vision "down under" in Ausieland

  Le Roux Breytenbach

  I assume blue Styrofoam is available down there SF. Is that correct?

  Other core material could be used . End grain balsa wood  is an
  excellent core material. For the thicker bulkheads.

  Wood door skin Luan plywood could be used for thin wing skins. It is
  a very light weight wood that is about 1/8th of an inch thick.

  It is low cost in the US. I noticed a distinct lack of plywood in
  the hardware stores when I was in Oz. Perhaps I am looking in the
  wrong stores.

  One might save some money at the expense of a little extra empty
  weight.

  The rotary can make up for that with a lot more power.

  Paul Lamar

  We use the Gurrit PVC foam cores yellow and green colour in sandwich
  construction. Yellow is 3.7  Lb/ft3 nominal density and Green 5
  Lb/ft3 Only 2 thickness sizes the 1/4 inch and 1/2 inch for all the
  building needs. Styrofoam is also used on some parts in building.

  The glass lay ups to sandwich the core material, is Uni directional
  or bi directional glass or carbon fiber or both according to the
  plans.

  Very light and strong.

  The Vision has a "wet wing" and the fuel is stored in fuel cells
  forward of the spar.Therefore no Styrofoam core material in wings.
  The wings have 1/4 inch pvc foam ribs with flanges sandwich between
  280 gsm twill weave glass

  Browse this site this is also a very interesting website as a
  alternative to kit build planes.

  http://krsuper2.com/

  Le Roux Breytenbach

  http://krsuper2.com/

  Cruise Speed ...    140 mph     140 mph Range ......... ..... 600
  miles     500 miles Engine.........     Corvair 2700     VW 2180
  Power.......... ''    100 HP  .......   70 HP Fuel Consumption... 5.5
  gph     4.5 gph


  There is some bull shit going on here.

  5.5 GPH is  35 pounds per hour  and that is about  75 HP with a BSFC
  of .45.

  It is not likely to go 140 MPH on 75 HP

  In fact it is unlikely to go 140 with 100 HP.

  In fact the 140 cubic inch Corvair is unlikely to put  anywhere near
  100 HP direct drive.

  Stock at 4400 RPM was 80 HP.

  My guess is it weighs about   200 pounds with out a gear box.

  http://corvaircenter.com/phorum/read.php?1,258166

  The VW specs are even more unlikely.

  Paul Lamar


  Just seeing the thoughts and stats regarding the Corvair and VW data
  for the Vision they are likely.. right on.!  At an event this weekend
  in Oshkosh (my neighboring town) and also the home of the Sonex...
  there is one guy running a Corvair and there are many VW
  (Revmaster/Aero-Vee) planes in this area. The numbers as I see them
  are for the cruising speeds (not HP) which the Vision compared to the
  Sonex are a little slower, but..


  We certainly don't give the maximum fuel burn while stating cruise
  speeds and then apply that to horsepower. I've enclosed what one of
  the Sonex guys that fly the Corvair and VW type engines listed on
  their aircraft.    Rated HP and cruise fuel burn look pretty much the
  same as in this post. The exchange was as follows.

  Re: Revmaster R2300 on the Sonex?

  What do you think your normal mission profile will be Chris? Do you
  see yourself doing a lot of cross countries, or flying around
  locally? Using the AeroVee (close to the same engine as the
  Revmaster) as well as the information from the Corvair website:

  Revmaster:  R-2300 VW engine  80hp at 2950 RPM, and 85hp at 3200
  RPM.

  Low altitude cruise: 130 mph, 4.5 gph = 3.5 hour endurance until
  empty, 450 mile range High atltitude cruise: 145 mph, 4.0 gph = 4
  hour endurance until empty, 550 mile range

  Corvair:  120 HP - 3.0

  Low altitude cruise: 150 mph, 6.0 gph = 2.75 hour endurance until
  empty, 400 mile range High altitude cruise: 170 mph, 5.0 gph = 3.25
  hour endurance until empty, 550 mile range

  Bear in mind that after around 2 hours I'm more than ready to get out
  and stretch. I've done several 2.5ish hour legs in my Waiex
  (Oshkosh, Crossville) without issue, but try to keep leg lengths
  shorter if possible. Of course, most of my flying is within 50 miles
  of my home base, so fast cruise speed isn't that big of a deal to me.
  Regardless of which engine you choose, you'll love the airplane!

  bruce buksyk

  The above numbers were not for the Vision. A larger KR.

  The Sonex is a tiny single place airplane with a V tail.

  The facts are the BSFC. That is a physical fact of life like the
  gravity constant. Unless you know what that is you can not argue the
  conversions. I was giving the benefit of the doubt. The engine in my
  C182 is .52 BSFC.

  A direct drive Corvair is at a decided disadvantage when it come to
  the prop. My guess running a Corvair at 3100 RPM is a ten to 15%
  efficiency disadvantage. That comes right out of the HP numbers.
  There is no magic if the stock Corvair makes 80 HP at 4400 RPM It
  sure and hell  will not make 120 HP at 3100 RPM. It is only 140 cubic inches.

The intake manifold is horrible :-) The other thing about it is the cylinder head temperature at 575 F is a failed exhaust valve waiting to happen.

  Same goes for an ungeared VW engine only worse as they run them at
  3500 RPM. That is the reason for the tiny prop you see on the Sonex.

  All this goes back to the Wright brothers with their huge diameter
  two geared props. More on this later.

  Paul Lamar

This is the performance figures of Vision #2 build by Sean Ponsonby and flew in 1997 These figures is in his article on the website.
The Vision Ex with longer wingspan can accept the 13B with say 300 ib fwf.Standard iron housings .The cg of the Vision Ex move forward with more or less 3 inch.
This is what is so nice for me about this building with plans, is you build the fuselage and install the engine package.Then you balance the plane on a beam and determine the cg.Then cut in the possision for the spar and install the wing.


   Specifications on Vision #0002



Engine: Lycoming O-320 160HP

Propeller: 2 Bladed Ivo-Magnum ground adjustable 68" diameter Empty Weight 925 lbs Max Gross 1450 lbs Fuel Capacity: 38 US Gallons 100LL (all fuel held in wet wing) Vso 58 IAS mph (stalls gently straight ahead)
Vs1 60 IAS mph
Vy 100 mph 2300 fpm solo @ Sea level
Vx 80 mph
Cruise 181 IAS mph = 209 TAS @ 75% power @ 8000'
Base to final 80 IAS mph
Over the fence 75 IAS mph
Touchdown 55 IAS mph (note that the aircraft is in ground effect)
Flaps: Electrically driven, plain type with 0-30 degrees deflection Cost of Airframe: $7,300 Cost of Engine: $11,000 (firewall forward) Cost of Instruments: $11,000


Le Roux Breytenbach

That $ is high for an engine. In the states you can get a running 13B for as little as $300 US.
Not including gear box of course. Did you get a gear box when you bought the airplane from Pierre Swanepoel?

Paul Lamar

No gearbox but following the newsletter with interest. All the info and R&D on a simple gearbox is for free in the newsletter and website.
Thanks for all the people sharing there "intellectual capital" and for you Paul as "pilot in command"
No reason to re-invent the wheel, I will follow in the footsteps of other with the gearbox, and will build it locally in ZA.

At this stage there is another 2 builders busy with Vision profects locally.
Vision Ex #338 will probably be the first flying with a 13B in ZA and perhaps the world.
Pieter Botha of ZA has build a Vision SP #342  but it is still grounded due to some "politics with the CAA".Engine O-360

Le Roux Breytenbach


Gear box's are not that hard to build if you can get six inch alloy tube with a one inch wall
and a good size lathe.

Just copy the Ross. Old Lou Ross (deceased) was a brilliant engineer.

Paul Lamar

The Rotary Engine free News Letter. Powered by Linux. If you want off
the list PLEASE let me know and I will remove  you.  ACRE NL web
site. http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas
Copyright 1998-2017 All world wide rights reserved.