Paul: Who wrote this? There was no name below it.
"A gyro, in a zero speed landing, lacks adequate rudder
authority
because the prop is idling and there is no forward speed to
produce
airflow over the rudder. It's is one of the great
vulnerabilities of
gyros and the reason for a lot of rotor strikes due to a
lack of yaw
control in the last moments of a zero speed landing. The
vectored
thrust from a ducted fan might fill that control gap."
I doubt whomever wrote it is a gyrocopter (or the FAA term:
gyroplane) pilot.
A lot of rotor strikes and lack of yaw control are not issues in
pusher gyrocopters. Zero speed landings are possible with some
headwind. Very low speed touchdowns are common, with 10-20 feet
rollouts.
Any rotor strikes of gyros one sees on youtube videos are almost
exclusively a takeoff situation, and a result of a pilot not
following their instructor's training to make sure the rotor
blades
are up to flight speed before lifting off the ground.
There is no need to develop some sort of ducted fan for pusher
gyros.
Kevin Richey Portland, Oregon
Boyd Thompson wrote that.
Suppose you are landing in a cross wind. Is that possible?
Paul Lamar
Hi Paul, Perhaps this is what the experienced pilot who
crashed my
project 18a was talking about?:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y5zWLTQXcUI Thanks. Boyd Thompson
Looks like you are right. I suggest a bigger rudder with a
45 degree
pivot to take advantage of the rotor down wash.
Paul Lamar
Urkh, he made a mess of that!
Must have been very poorly trained. He tried to land like a
fixed wing!
Bad mistake.
What downwash are you talking about Paul?
In autorotation - whether it be Gyro or helicopter there is no
downwash,
air actually goes up through the rotor disc.
May I suggest everyone studies autorotation before further
comment.
John Evans
Your right about the gyro John.
My mistake on the gyro. I was thinking like a helicopter under
power :-)
The 45 degree rudder thing won't work on a gyro.
Back to the bi directional starter motor electric blaster.
Paul Lamar
I have been watching his conversation with amusement.
First of all I have about 2300 hours in Gyros. While I've never flown
a factory job like an 18a, I have built and flown several KB2's,
gyrobees, 3DRV, and of course my own design ( which is really kind of a
combination of the stuff from Ken Brock's gyro and the 3D RV by Monte
Hoskins).
Now the video refers to is just either someone screwing around during
Landing, or really bad landing techniques. A low time pilot not really
knowing what he's doing or a fixed-wing pilot trying to teach
himself to
fly gyro.
I have done plenty of zero Landing rolls and I can tell you right now
the Rudders work fine just like they're supposed to. To make a ducted
fan tail is just trying to be different, there's no need for it.
Igor Benson pretty much laid down the framework for the modern-day
Gyros. Slight design changes for thrust line through the CoG and
lowering the center-of-gravity to prevent POP (powered push over),
better blades and the offset gimbal rotor head have been the only real
advances. That's because they fly fine, no need to reinvent the wheel.
David Mikesell
San Jose, CA
Thanks, David. I appreciate your time and the time of all those who have
responded on this. I know this must seem like someone wanting to put
training wheels on a motorcycle. I rode a couple of times with Bill
Parsons, then he was gone a short time later. Good guy.
What do you make of the South African data, with the after landing
accidents being the second largest category, and the apparently high
fatality rate relative to General Aviation? Too small a data set? Post
landing issues similar to fixed wing? Do you know of a similar NTSB
study? Thanks for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Boyd Thompson
The Rotary Engine free News Letter. Powered by Linux. If you
want
off the list PLEASE let me know and I will remove you. ACRE
NL web
site.
http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube
http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas
Copyright 1998-2017 All world wide rights reserved.