Subject: Making your own steel coupling.
From: paul lamar
Date: 6/23/2017, 5:29 PM
To: A10-Me-Earthlink


 I have an idea for you Scott.

 There is a water jet company in 1500 Airway Circle, New Smyrna Beach
 FL. 32168 | 386-424-7333 <tel:386-424-7333


 I have some drawings of a steel coupling that can be made out of
 water jet cut steel parts.

 Then you will need to find a local tig welder to weld it up.

 I have some of the parts. The inner plate that bolts to the counter
 weight and the outer ring cut from six inch tubing.

 $50 plus mailing.

 Use part of Tracy's torque isolator to adapt this to Tracy's PSRU
 input shaft. Drill out the rivets and bolt it to the steel output
 front plate.

 Paul Lamar

 Very interesting!  I can query the water jet shop, and will order
 these parts if the  shop can make the rest.  No problem with the
 welder.

 How thick is the metal?

 Do you intend for an outer ring to be cut into the small curved
 shapes, or make these from scratch?  I guess  they can be flat
 instead of curved?

 I also assume the 1.78” is the height of each component, so the
 total thickness would be about 2”?  I will study my redrive to look
 for areas of potential interference.

 Please ignore the curved questions of my last post, sorry. Some of
 the latter images didn’t display the first time.  I see the
 connecting elements are square.

 Thanks!

 Scott Gettings

 .050 to .150. Some of the stuff is  .083. You make it out of what
 you can find :-) The six inch tubing is about .150 wall.

 The total thickness is about 1.8 inches. Nothing about this is
 critical. One inches would work if your not shooting for 500 HP.

 Ignore those square pictures. The latest are triangular or wedge
 shaped. The square ones bottom out corner to corner. We discovered
 that when we built the TTC coupling.

 If I get a little more interest in this I wall make a tool that
 bends the wedges in a hydraulic press. Saves a bit of welding. I have
 built tools like that in the past. That would pay off as the same
 design can be used in new gear boxes. We already used one of these
 that was similar in a 3 rotor.

 I have not heard back from Kevin so if Kevin finds an NC shop that
 can make them out of billet at reasonable cost that would be more
 accurate.

 In any event once this is welded up it would be wise to balance it
 between parallel bars. If your gear box is off the engine please
 tell me the diameter of the input spline adapter Tracy is using. The
 one with all the rivets. That will control the diameter of the
 forward plate.

 Paul Lamar



 Paul,

 My welder can assemble these small steel parts, but is not highly
 confident of the  precise alignment and balance of the end product.
 It looks like some other options are evolving, so I’ll keep  this
 one on hold.

 My gearbox is on the engine, but if you need the exact shaft
 diameter soon, I will be happy to pull the it and measure the shaft.

 Other measurements that might be helpful: distance from front edge of
 flex plate gear to rear of engine block:  1 5/16” distance from front
 of Tracy’s adapter plate to engine block (the total “open” area
 between the engine and adapter):  3 1/8” distance from front of
 Tracy’s adapter plate to rear face of his riveted spline adapter: 1
 1/4” the front of the spline adapter appears very close to the rear
 edge of the flex plate ring gear.

 It appears that the total thickness of a new coupler (for Tracy’s
 RD) would need to be the exact distance from the rear face of the
 bolted area of the flex plate to the rear of its ring gear, which is
 the plane of the front of the riveted part of the spline adapter.
 This would maintain the dimensions for the thrust bearings.  A
 coupler that is more thick than this would move the rest of the RD to
 the rear, requiring alteration of the existing spacers (the 3 1/8”
 distance).  A thinner coupler could be managed with thrust bearing
 washers.

 Scott Gettings

 I just happened to have one. The OD of the part in question is 6.188.
 The long part that sticks away from the engine 1.158 long.

 The idea is to turn it around and put the long part inside the
 coupling. We worked this out years ago :-) 3D's 5 and six show this
 config.

 That Ford part raw weighs 3 pounds. There is unnecessary meat on both
 sides that I can be cut off if you send me yours. That will give you
 plenty of room and save a bit of weight. Some of the spline part can
 be cut off as well. 1.25 inches of spline would be plenty.

 Jean is down the road from you in Pompano Beach and he might do it
 for you. He has a lathe and a mill. He will need one sooner or later
 :-)

 Here are a few pictures.

 Paul Lamar


 Scott, I'll check the dimensions on my RV4. It still has Tracy's
 coupling so I will need to change that anyway. I was going to use it
 to flight test my new gear box design.

 Here are a couple of pictures about what my coupling  looks like
 now.

 Here is what it might cost if you had the coupling NC Milled In US
 dollars from the Internet.

 Setup/Programming - 40

 Fixturing - 60

 Engineering Services - 40

 Machining Time Per Part - 60

 Inspection/Deburr - 40

 Test Part Machining - 60

 BS Time - 40

 Let me know what you are leaning towards so I won't have to take the
 gear box off my RV4  just yet :-)

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------


OK Scott I got motivated. Lately I have been suffering from lack of motivation :-)

 The max thickness of the coupling is 2.25 inches thick from the
 surface of the flex plate to the back of Tracy's spline adapter. That
 is a cut down stock ford transmission part. I cut mine down a bit
 more and saved .5 pound. I turned it around and put the long side
 inside the coupling.

 This gear box has about 30 flight hours on it so far.

 Here are all the pictures. A lot of work :-)

 Paul Lamar


 This looks like quite a bit of work!! Most of it is well beyond my
 level of expertise, but with detailed drawings and instructions, and
 Paul's help, it may be achievable. Is the updated coupler design the
 primary deciding factor at this point in time?

Scott Gettings

I am not sure what you mean by that but it works as it has been
flown on a 3 rotor and the TTC.

I did a lot of work taking mine apart this morning to check the
max length. Here are six pictures taken this morning.

Paul Lamar


The Rotary Engine free News Letter. Powered by Linux. If you want off
the list PLEASE let me know and I will remove  you.  ACRE NL web
site. http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas
Copyright 1998-2017 All world wide rights reserved.