12

2018.03.05

Hello Paul,

don't know, whether you will "publish" the following notes ;-)

With regards to the "cut outs" in the sliding surface / trochoid housing ...
see patents US 3.393.666 (1966) + US 4.040.392 (1976).

Better than reading a long text is playing around with a "paper made RE" or
a plastic model. Enclosed you will find 2 PDF files with 2 "engine sizes".

Can print it out + cut out the rotor. It's not necessary to cut out the
gears + to shorten the teeth a bit (lot of work).

Moving direction is clockwise.

The bold horizontal bars shall indicate the pressure difference between two
chambers.

Recess shapes are examples only. (flat Mazda MDR, flat OMC / F+S style, AVL
style).

The thin lines + numbers stand for degree of eccentric shaft. 0 degrees is
Top Center at combustion side. (Rotor tip pointing to the "0" line).

Sorry for the low quality - drawings are "generated by Access" + I'm a
layman in graphics ;-)

Nothing very exact - points are very small rectangles, positioned by "left"
+ "top" corner ...

If you lay down the rotor with an apex near to the short axis + let the
rotor "move" a bit forward + backward, you will see, that there's a huge
amount of leakage + you would not need any seals anymore ;-)

Your solution may look a bit like this ...
     _    _
____|x|__|x|____ < housing with "channels"
---------------- > apex seal during "passing by"
x > leakage areas


Turbulence ...
yes, it's true, turbulence will enhance combustion. Flame front surface will
be enlarged + burning speed will increase. But, too much of turbulence will
rise heat losses to the walls. The key is to get the right balance.

Look at the patent Wo 2013.017.232, showing refined versions of reccesses
with smooth transitions.
Result of CFD simulations of over 100 different combinations of spark plug
positions + recess shapes.

Hardware used by AVL may be something like that:
HPC cluster with 320 (three-hundred-and-twenty) CPUs (3,6 GHz Intel Xeon) +
300 GB RAM (not MB !)
Even with this resources a single simulation will usually take several weeks
;-)

Another interesting patent is US 3.398.724 by Daimler-Benz (1966). This
patent is worth to be read twice + carefully. Don't miss the description of
figure 7 ;-)

More interesting stuff you can find in / at the WWW, e.g. ...
Effect of Spark Plug Arrangement on Flame Propagation of Rotary Engine
(Mazda 2009)

Amelioration of Combustion of Hydrogen Rotary Engine (turbulence by vortex
blade)
(Mazda 2012)

Some rules of thumb ...
# best BSFC is reached with a far leading recess
# max MEP you will get with a centered recess
(so a combination / blending is preferred)
# intensive combustion at the T section will rise heat losses + BSFC only
due to cardboard-thin "chamber" with very bad S/V ratio
# you should provide as much mixture / chamber volume as possible at the
spark plugs + downstream / in direction to the L apex
# depth of the recess opposite to spark plugs should be as deep as possible
- less quenching of flame kernel
# always think of recess position + spark plug position as an "integrated
whole"
# influence of seals is much greater than e.g. that of heat loss or crevice
volume
# ...

+ a - sometimes forgotten - truism ...
chemical reaction (combustion) will only happen between fuel + air, if the
fuel is vaporized. So try to avoid wall films + big droplet sizes (multi
hole injectors may be a solution)

Well, I guess, that's enough "blah blah" ;-)


Best regards

Franky / Frank Herfert


------------------------------------------------------------------
Please  add your questions or comments  at the end of the thread.
Not the beginning.

I am going to enforce that rule. If people don't do that it will not be forwarded.
My ISP changed the rules.

The Rotary Engine free News Letter. Powered by Linux. If you want off
the list PLEASE let me know and I will remove  you.  ACRE NL web
site. http://www.rotaryeng.net You Tube http://tinyurl.com/beqqxas
Copyright 1998-2018 All world wide rights reserved.