Subject: TTC Wankel done slightly differently 12 a
From: paul lamar
Date: 12/9/2018, 9:15 PM
To: A10-Me-Earthlink




   12 a

   Hi Paul,

   since I found your homepage, I've been following your mailing list. As I am a PPL
   student now, I've been tinkering about the perfect GA engine in my head for some
   time. I love the idea of turbo compounding the wankel for aviation use, especially
   for GA I think that the world needs something more efficient than what we currently have.
   The problem about adding the turbo compound is that it requires major modifications
   to the engine plus a huge gearbox to get the turbo shaft speed down engine shaft
   speed. Not easy to build a proof of concept demonstrator that way ...

   So how about this:
   Imagine a 2-rotor wankel, like e.g. the RX 8 engine but with peripheral port (ref
   book "Rotary Engines" by Kenichi Yamamoto). Add a BIG turbo charger. Now the turbo
   compounding could be done by using only one rotor as a fuel burning ICE. The second
   rotor on the other hand acts as our compound turbine. We simply feed the hot exhaust
   gasses directly back into the 2nd rotor's intake port to recover the exhaust gas energy.
   After the 2nd exhaust comes the turbo, and catalytic converter and a silencer.
   Depending on EGT, it would also be possible to first route the hot exhaust through
   the catalytic and the turbo to get some of the energy out first before running it
   back into the 2nd rotor.

   The big advantage of this setup: it can be done with more or less stock parts and
   some bent pipes, no custom molding & casting required to do a first proof of concept.

   What do you think? Doable? Because the only alternative is going full electric but
   that's still taking some time until battery tech is getting good enough for decent
   range. And that's from me being an electrical engineer, who is heavily biased towards
   all-electric propulsion ...

   Best regards from Germany
   Valentin Felsne

   In my opinion global warming is a hoax and a religion. Emission from propeller driven
   aircraft will
   never have a measurable effect on the atmosphere. It all sounds like a waste of time
   and money.

   The benefits of turbo compound are a better power to weight ratio and an increase range
   and payload. Also shorter take offs due to a much better power to weight ratio.
   You should focus on that.

   Paul Lamar



   I agree global warming is political and just another means of increasing costs and spending to create a false economy, there has always been climate changes throughout history without human input. Also you could ground every propeller driven aircraft and it would be impossible to see a measurable effect.


   Thanks, Jacob Sturges


   Quote:
   In a rather testy exchange during a House hearing, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher tore into Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy for not knowing what percentage of the atmosphere was made up of carbon dioxide.

   What percentage of the atmosphere is CO2?” the California Republican asked during a Thursday hearing.

   I don’t have that calculation for you, sir,” McCarthy replied. “I don’t make those guesses, sir.

   You’re head of the EPA and you did not know,” Rohrabacher shot back in astonishment, “and now you are basing policies that impact dramatically on the American people and you didn’t know what the content of CO2 in the atmosphere was… the justification for the very policies you’re talking about.

   If you’re asking me how much CO2 is in the atmosphere, not a percentage but how much, we have just reached levels of 400 parts per million, McCarthy said, looking slightly annoyed with the lawmaker’s response.

   Rohrabacher said carbon dioxide only makes up “one-half of one-tenth of one percent of the atmosphere, adding that mankind only contributed to about 10 percent of the total amount of CO2.


   The Earth’s atmosphere is 78 percent nitrogen, 21 percent oxygen and 1 percent other gases, including about 0.04 percent carbon dioxide. And yes, Earth’s CO2 concentration stood at 400 parts per million in May 2015.

   End Quote.

   They measured it in Hawaii back in May 2015 and not again since then. Not only that there is an active
   volcano in Hawaii.  :-)  The EPA is really stupid.

   Paul Lamar



------------------------------------------------------------------
   Please  add your questions or comments  at the end of the thread. Not the beginning.

   I am going to enforce that rule. If people don't do that it will not be published. My
   ISP changed the rules.

   The Rotary Engine free News Letter. Powered by Linux. If you want off the list PLEASE
   let me know and I will remove  you.

   ACRE NL web site. http://www.rotaryeng.net
   YouTube  Key word "PaulLamar2". Keep clicking
   this as Youtube will try to divert you to advertising.
   Copyright 1998-2018 All world wide rights reserved.